Strong evidence for an accelerating universe
arXiv:1702.08244 · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201730469
Abstract
A recent analysis of the Supernova Ia data claims a 'marginal' () evidence for a cosmic acceleration. This result has been complemented with a non-accelerating cosmology, which was presented as a valid alternative to the CDM model. In this paper, we use the same analysis to show that a non-marginal evidence for acceleration is actually found. We compare the standard Friedmann models to the cosmology by complementing SN Ia data with the Baryon Acoustic Oscillations, Gamma Ray Bursts and Observational Hubble datasets. We also study the power-law model which is a functional generalisation of . We find that the evidence for late-time acceleration is beyond refutable at a 4.56 confidence level from SN Ia data alone, and at an even stronger confidence level () from our joint analysis. Also, the non-accelerating model fails to statistically compare with the CDM having a .
References in corpus (12)
- The Clustering of the SDSS DR7 Main Galaxy Sample I: A 4 per cent Distance Measure at z=0.15
- Raising the bar: new constraints on the Hubble parameter with cosmic chronometers at z2
- Baryon Acoustic Oscillations in the Lyα forest of BOSS DR11 quasars
- The trouble with
- Correcting Type Ia Supernova Distances for Selection Biases and Contamination in Photometrically Identified Samples
- Is the expansion of the universe accelerating? All signs point to yes
- Constraints on cosmological parameters in power-law cosmology
- We do not live in the R_h = c t universe
- Robust model comparison disfavors power law cosmology
- Is there a concordance value for ?
- Testing power-law cosmology with galaxy clusters
- Power-law cosmology, SN Ia, and BAO