The extent and drivers of gender imbalance in neuroscience reference lists

Abstract

Like many scientific disciplines, neuroscience has increasingly attempted to confront pervasive gender imbalances within the field. While much of the conversation has centered around publishing and conference participation, recent research in other fields has called attention to the prevalence of gender bias in citation practices. Because of the downstream effects that citations can have on visibility and career advancement, understanding and eliminating gender bias in citation practices is vital for addressing inequity in a scientific community. In this study, we sought to determine whether there is evidence of gender bias in the citation practices of neuroscientists. Using data from five top neuroscience journals, we find that reference lists tend to include more papers with men as first and last author than would be expected if gender were not a factor in referencing. Importantly, we show that this overcitation of men and undercitation of women is driven largely by the citation practices of men, and is increasing over time as the field becomes more diverse. We develop a co-authorship network to assess homophily in researchers' social networks, and we find that men tend to overcite men even when their social networks are representative. We discuss possible mechanisms and consider how individual researchers might address these findings in their own practices.

References in corpus (8)

• Historical comparison of gender inequality in scientific careers across countries and disciplines
• The role of gender in scholarly authorship
• The Preeminence of Ethnic Diversity in Scientific Collaboration
• Quantitative Evaluation of Gender Bias in Astronomical Publications from Citation Counts
• Reputation and Impact in Academic Careers
• Men Set Their Own Cites High: Gender and Self-citation across Fields and over Time
• Homophily and minority size explain perception biases in social networks
• Gender Disparities in Science? Dropout, Productivity, Collaborations and Success of Male and Female Computer Scientists

Cited by in corpus (14)

• Large-scale neural recordings call for new insights to link brain and behavior
• Broken detailed balance and entropy production in the human brain
• Citation inequity and gendered citation practices in contemporary physics
• Time-evolving controllability of effective connectivity networks during seizure progression
• Using Design Metaphors to Understand User Expectations of Socially Interactive Robot Embodiments
• First-mover advantage explains gender disparities in physics citations
• Quantifying gender imbalance in East Asian academia: Research career and citation practice
• Soft matter crystallography -- complex, diverse, and new crystal structures in condensed materials on the mesoscale
• The information content of brain states is explained by structural constraints on state energetics
• Optimizing the Human Learnability of Abstract Network Representations
• Citation proximus: the role of social and semantic ties in citing behaviour
• Evaluating Temporal Patterns in Applied Infant Affect Recognition
• BCI learning induces core-periphery reorganization in M/EEG multiplex brain networks
• Network Inequality through Preferential Attachment, Triadic Closure, and Homophily