Quantitative Evaluation of Gender Bias in Astronomical Publications from Citation Counts

Abstract

We analyze the role of first (leading) author gender on the number of citations that a paper receives, on the publishing frequency and on the self-citing tendency. We consider a complete sample of over 200,000 publications from 1950 to 2015 from five major astronomy journals. We determine the gender of the first author for over 70% of all publications. The fraction of papers which have a female first author has increased from less than 5% in the 1960s to about 25% today. We find that the increase of the fraction of papers authored by females is slowest in the most prestigious journals such as Science and Nature. Furthermore, female authors write 19$\pm$7% fewer papers in seven years following their first paper than their male colleagues. At all times papers with male first authors receive more citations than papers with female first authors. This difference has been decreasing with time and amounts to $\sim$6% measured over the last 30 years. To account for the fact that the properties of female and male first author papers differ intrinsically, we use a random forest algorithm to control for the non-gender specific properties of these papers which include seniority of the first author, number of references, total number of authors, year of publication, publication journal, field of study and region of the first author's institution. We show that papers authored by females receive 10.4$\pm$0.9% fewer citations than what would be expected if the papers with the same non-gender specific properties were written by the male authors. Finally, we also find that female authors in our sample tend to self-cite more, but that this effect disappears when controlled for non-gender specific variables.

arXiv commentAbridged version to be submitted to Nature Astronomy. Comments welcome. For readers with very little time, the central result of the paper is covered by Figure 6 (Section 5)

References in corpus (3)

• The role of gender in scholarly authorship
• Gender-based Systematics in HST Proposal Selection
• Asking gender questions: Results from a survey of gender and question asking among UK Astronomers at NAM2014

Cited by in corpus (17)

• The extent and drivers of gender imbalance in neuroscience reference lists
• Citation inequity and gendered citation practices in contemporary physics
• Time-evolving controllability of effective connectivity networks during seizure progression
• Models of communication and control for brain networks: distinctions, convergence, and future outlook
• Using Design Metaphors to Understand User Expectations of Socially Interactive Robot Embodiments
• Learning Continuous Chaotic Attractors with a Reservoir Computer
• Soft matter crystallography -- complex, diverse, and new crystal structures in condensed materials on the mesoscale
• The information content of brain states is explained by structural constraints on state energetics
• Path-dependent connectivity, not modularity, consistently predicts controllability of structural brain networks
• Thirty Years of Academic Finance
• SeqSeg: Learning Local Segments for Automatic Vascular Model Construction
• Optimizing the Human Learnability of Abstract Network Representations
• How Does Author Affiliation Affect Preprint Citation Count? Analyzing Citation Bias at the Institution and Country Level
• What Does a Successful Postdoctoral Fellowship Publication Record Look Like?
• Women of the Future in the Royal Astronomical Society
• BCI learning induces core-periphery reorganization in M/EEG multiplex brain networks
• Evaluating Temporal Patterns in Applied Infant Affect Recognition