Hermione and the Secretary: How gendered task division in introductory physics labs can disrupt equitable learning

Abstract

Physics labs provide a unique opportunity for students to grow their physics identity and science identity in general since they provide students with opportunity to tinker with experiments and analyze data in a low-stakes environment. However, it is important to ensure that all students are benefiting from the labs equally and have a positive growth trajectory. Through interviews and reflexive ethnographic observations, we identify and analyze two common modes of work that may disadvantage female students in introductory physics labs. Students who adopt the Secretary archetype are relegated to recording and analyzing data, and thus miss out on much of the opportunity to grow their physics and science identities by engaging fully in the experimental work. Meanwhile, students in the Hermione mode shoulder a disproportionate amount of managerial work, and also do not get adequate opportunity to engage with different aspects of the experimental work that are essential for helping them develop their physics and science identities. Using a physics identity framework, we analyze interviews and observational data to investigate how students under these modes of work may experience stunted growth in their physics and science identity trajectories in their physics lab course. This stunted growth then perpetuates and reinforces societal stereotypes and biases about who does physics. This categorization not only gives a vocabulary to discussions about equity in the lab, but can also serve as a useful touchstone for those who seek to center equity in efforts to transform physics instruction.

References in corpus (7)

• Enriching gender in PER: A binary past and a complex future
• Impact of peer interaction on conceptual test performance
• Do evidence-based active-engagement courses reduce the gender gap in introductory physics?
• Student ownership of projects in an upper-division optics laboratory course: A multiple case study of successful experiences
• Research-based assessment of students' beliefs about experimental physics: When is gender a factor?
• Who does what now? How physics lab instruction impacts student behaviors
• Participating in the Physics Lab: Does Gender Matter?

Cited by in corpus (14)

• How perception of being recognized or not recognized by instructors as a "physics person" impacts male and female students' self-efficacy and performance
• Not engaging with problems in the lab: Students' navigation of conflicting data and models
• The impact of perceived recognition by physics instructors on women's self-efficacy and interest
• Gender Equity in Physics Labs: A Review
• Lessons from Transforming Second-Year Honors Physics Lab
• Who and what gets recognized in peer recognition
• Statistically equivalent models with different causal structures: An example from physics identity
• Comparing major declaration, attrition, migration, and completion in physics with other STEM disciplines
• Using Unguided Peer Collaboration to Facilitate Early Educators' Pedagogical Development: An Example from Physics TA Training
• Students' attitudes toward experimental physics in a conceptual inquiry-based introductory physics lab
• Sense of agency, gender, and students' perception in open-ended physics labs
• Inclusive Mentoring: The Mindset of an Effective Mentor
• Unveiling Gender Dynamics in Introductory Physics Labs
• How learning environment predicts male and female students' physics motivational beliefs in introductory physics courses