Bounding the plausibility of physical theories in a device-independent setting via hypothesis testing

Abstract

The device-independent approach to physics is one where conclusions about physical systems (and hence of Nature) are drawn directly and solely from the observed correlations between measurement outcomes. This operational approach to physics arose as a byproduct of Bell's seminal work to distinguish, via a Bell test, quantum correlations from the set of correlations allowed by local-hidden-variable theories. In practice, since one can only perform a finite number of experimental trials, deciding whether an empirical observation is compatible with some class of physical theories will have to be carried out via the task of hypothesis testing. In this paper, we show that the prediction-based-ratio method---initially developed for performing a hypothesis test of local-hidden-variable theories---can equally well be applied to test many other classes of physical theories, such as those constrained only by the nonsignaling principle, and those that are constrained to produce any of the outer approximation to the quantum set of correlations due to Navascués-Pironio-Ac\'ın. We numerically simulate Bell tests using hypothetical nonlocal sources of correlations to illustrate the applicability of the method in both the independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.) scenario and the non-i.i.d. scenario. As a further application, we demonstrate how this method allows us to unveil an apparent violation of the nonsignaling conditions in certain experimental data collected in a Bell test. This, in turn, highlights the importance of the randomization of measurement settings, as well as a consistency check of the nonsignaling conditions in a Bell test.

arXiv comment10 pages, 1 figure, 3 tables (essentially the published version with simplified discussion and clearer presentation of results)

References in corpus (53)

• Quantum Cryptography
• Experimental loophole-free violation of a Bell inequality using entangled electron spins separated by 1.3 km
• Bell nonlocality
• Device-independent security of quantum cryptography against collective attacks
• Violation of Bell's inequality under strict Einstein locality conditions
• Significant-loophole-free test of Bell's theorem with entangled photons
• Random Numbers Certified by Bell's Theorem
• A strong loophole-free test of local realism
• Violation of Bell inequalities by photons more than 10 km apart
• No Signalling and Quantum Key Distribution
• Information Causality as a Physical Principle
• A convergent hierarchy of semidefinite programs characterizing the set of quantum correlations
• From Bell's Theorem to Secure Quantum Key Distribution
• Bell violation with entangled photons, free of the fair-sampling assumption
• Non-local correlations as an information theoretic resource
• Bounding the set of quantum correlations
• Fully device independent quantum key distribution
• Detection-Loophole-Free Test of Quantum Nonlocality, and Applications
• Event-Ready Bell Test Using Entangled Atoms Simultaneously Closing Detection and Locality Loopholes
• A limit on nonlocality in any world in which communication complexity is not trivial
• Private Randomness Expansion With Untrusted Devices
• Testing the Hilbert space dimension
• Device independent quantum random number generation
• A glance beyond the quantum model
• Local orthogonality as a multipartite principle for quantum correlations
• Almost quantum correlations
• All Pure Bipartite Entangled States can be Self-Tested
• Device-independent entanglement quantification and related applications
• No quantum advantage for nonlocal computation
• Geometry of the set of quantum correlations
• Quantum nonlocality based on finite-speed causal influences leads to superluminal signaling
• Robust and versatile black-box certification of quantum devices
• Experimental Three-Particle Quantum Nonlocality under Strict Locality Conditions
• Arbitrarily small amount of measurement independence is sufficient to manifest quantum nonlocality
• Natural Framework for Device-Independent Quantification of Quantum Steerability, Measurement Incompatibility, and Self-Testing
• Optimal Bell tests do not require maximally entangled states
• Testing Local Realism into the Past without Detection and Locality Loopholes
• Family of Bell-like inequalities as device-independent witnesses for entanglement depth
• Experimental violation of multipartite Bell inequalities with trapped ions
• Randomness extraction from Bell violation with continuous parametric down conversion
• Asymptotically optimal data analysis for rejecting local realism
• Certifying the building blocks of quantum computers from Bell's theorem
• Macroscopically local correlations can violate information causality
• Tripartite quantum state violating the hidden influence constraints
• Approaching Tsirelson's bound in a photon pair experiment
• Device-independent point estimation from finite data and its application to device-independent property estimation
• Efficient quantification of experimental evidence against local realism
• The exclusivity principle forbids sets of correlations larger than the quantum set
• Test of the no-signaling principle in the Hensen "loophole-free CHSH experiment"
• Analysis of assumptions of recent tests of local realism
• Is Einsteinian no-signalling violated in Bell Tests?
• Exploring the framework of assemblage moment matrices and its applications in device-independent characterizations
• The statistical strength of experiments to reject local realism with photon pairs and inefficient detectors

Cited by in corpus (11)

• Device-independent tests of structures of measurement incompatibility
• Postquantum common-cause channels: the resource theory of local operations and shared entanglement
• Quantum prescriptions are more ontologically distinct than they are operationally distinguishable
• Contextuality-by-Default description of Bell tests: Contextuality as the rule not as an exception
• Quantum correlations on the no-signaling boundary: self-testing and more
• Quantum Nonlocality: how does Nature do it?
• Device-independent certification of multipartite entanglement using measurements performed in randomly chosen triads
• Device-independent Verification of Quantum Coherence without Quantum Control
• Device-independent certification of desirable properties with a confidence interval
• How to avoid (apparent) signaling in Bell tests
• Violation of no-signaling on a public quantum computer