Estimating the impact of structural directionality: How reliable are undirected connectomes?
arXiv:1801.01651 · doi:10.1162/NETN_a_00040
Abstract
Directionality is a fundamental feature of network connections. Most structural brain networks are intrinsically directed because of the nature of chemical synapses, which comprise most neuronal connections. Due to limitations of non-invasive imaging techniques, the directionality of connections between structurally connected regions of the human brain cannot be confirmed. Hence, connections are represented as undirected, and it is still unknown how this lack of directionality affects brain network topology. Using six directed brain networks from different species and parcellations (cat, mouse, C. elegans, and three macaque networks), we estimate the inaccuracies in network measures (degree, betweenness, clustering coefficient, path length, global efficiency, participation index, and small worldness) associated with the removal of the directionality of connections. We employ three different methods to render directed brain networks undirected: (i) remove uni-directional connections, (ii) add reciprocal connections, and (iii) combine equal numbers of removed and added uni-directional connections. We quantify the extent of inaccuracy in network measures introduced through neglecting connection directionality for individual nodes and across the network. We find that the coarse division between core and peripheral nodes remains accurate for undirected networks. However, hub nodes differ considerably when directionality is neglected. Comparing the different methods to generate undirected networks from directed ones, we generally find that the addition of reciprocal connections (false positives) causes larger errors in graph-theoretic measures than the removal of the same number of directed connections (false negatives). These findings suggest that directionality plays an essential role in shaping brain networks and highlight some limitations of undirected connectomes.
arXiv comment29 pages, 6 figures, 9 supplementary figures, 4 supplementary tables
References in corpus (21)
- Fast unfolding of communities in large networks
- Efficient Behavior of Small-World Networks
- Functional cartography of complex metabolic networks
- Identification of influential spreaders in complex networks
- Characterization of complex networks: A survey of measurements
- Detecting rich-club ordering in complex networks
- Structural Properties of the Caenorhabditis elegans Neuronal Network
- Extracting the multiscale backbone of complex weighted networks
- Consensus clustering in complex networks
- Clustering in Complex Directed Networks
- Patterns of link reciprocity in directed networks
- Revealing Network Connectivity From Dynamics
- Dwelling Quietly in the Rich Club: Brain Network Determinants of Slow Cortical Fluctuations
- Mapping how local perturbations influence systems-level brain dynamics
- Mechanisms of Zero-Lag Synchronization in Cortical Motifs
- The frustrated brain: From dynamics on motifs to communities and networks
- Reconstructing Links in Directed Networks from Noisy Dynamics
- Emergent multistability and frustration in phase-repulsive networks of oscillators
- Estimating the impact of structural directionality: How reliable are undirected connectomes?
- Structural and functional networks in complex systems with delay
- Inhibitory loop robustly induces anticipated synchronization in neuronal microcircuits
Cited by in corpus (8)
- Broken detailed balance and entropy production in the human brain
- Relations between large scale brain connectivity and effects of regional stimulation depend on collective dynamical state
- Estimating the impact of structural directionality: How reliable are undirected connectomes?
- Broken detailed balance and entropy production in directed networks
- Nonequilibrium physics of brain dynamics
- Network analysis of the human structural connectome including the brainstem
- Network Hierarchy and Pattern Recovery in Directed Sparse Hopfield Networks
- Why is neural connection weight a weak predictor of correlated neural activity?