Network segregation in a model of misinformation and fact checking
arXiv:1610.04170 · doi:10.1007/s42001-018-0018-9
Abstract
Misinformation under the form of rumor, hoaxes, and conspiracy theories spreads on social media at alarming rates. One hypothesis is that, since social media are shaped by homophily, belief in misinformation may be more likely to thrive on those social circles that are segregated from the rest of the network. One possible antidote is fact checking which, in some cases, is known to stop rumors from spreading further. However, fact checking may also backfire and reinforce the belief in a hoax. Here we take into account the combination of network segregation, finite memory and attention, and fact-checking efforts. We consider a compartmental model of two interacting epidemic processes over a network that is segregated between gullible and skeptic users. Extensive simulation and mean-field analysis show that a more segregated network facilitates the spread of a hoax only at low forgetting rates, but has no effect when agents forget at faster rates. This finding may inform the development of mitigation techniques and overall inform on the risks of uncontrolled misinformation online.
References in corpus (9)
- Epidemic processes in complex networks
- Structure and tie strengths in mobile communication networks
- Dynamics of Rumor Spreading in Complex Networks
- Science vs Conspiracy: collective narratives in the age of (mis)information
- Computational fact checking from knowledge networks
- Modeling Rumors: The No Plane Pentagon French Hoax Case
- Competition-induced criticality in a model of meme popularity
- Interacting epidemics and coinfection on contact networks
- The production of information in the attention economy
Cited by in corpus (4)
- Fake news agenda in the era of COVID-19: Identifying trends through fact-checking content
- Studying Fake News Spreading, Polarisation Dynamics, and Manipulation by Bots: a Tale of Networks and Language
- Skepticism and rumor spreading: the role of spatial correlations
- Ensemble of Opinion Dynamics Models to Understand the Role of the Undecided in the Vaccination Debate