Science vs Conspiracy: collective narratives in the age of (mis)information
arXiv:1408.1667 · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0118093
Abstract
The large availability of user provided contents on online social media facilitates people aggregation around common interests, worldviews and narratives. However, in spite of the enthusiastic rhetoric about the so called {\em wisdom of crowds}, unsubstantiated rumors -- as alternative explanation to main stream versions of complex phenomena -- find on the Web a natural medium for their dissemination. In this work we study, on a sample of 1.2 million of individuals, how information related to very distinct narratives -- i.e. main stream scientific and alternative news -- are consumed on Facebook. Through a thorough quantitative analysis, we show that distinct communities with similar information consumption patterns emerge around distinctive narratives. Moreover, consumers of alternative news (mainly conspiracy theories) result to be more focused on their contents, while scientific news consumers are more prone to comment on alternative news. We conclude our analysis testing the response of this social system to 4709 troll information -- i.e. parodistic imitation of alternative and conspiracy theories. We find that, despite the false and satirical vein of news, usual consumers of conspiracy news are the most prone to interact with them.
References in corpus (3)
Cited by in corpus (32)
- Arming the public with artificial intelligence to counter social bots
- An automated pipeline for the discovery of conspiracy and conspiracy theory narrative frameworks: Bridgegate, Pizzagate and storytelling on the web
- Echo Chambers on Social Media: A comparative analysis
- Twitter-based analysis of the dynamics of collective attention to political parties
- On the statistical properties of viral misinformation in online social media
- Conspiracy in the Time of Corona: Automatic detection of Covid-19 Conspiracy Theories in Social Media and the News
- Viral Misinformation: The Role of Homophily and Polarization
- Bounded Confidence under Preferential Flip: A Coupled Dynamics of Structural Balance and Opinions
- Dataset of Fake News Detection and Fact Verification: A Survey
- Believability and Harmfulness Shape the Virality of Misleading Social Media Posts
- The Russian invasion of Ukraine selectively depolarized the Finnish NATO discussion
- What Makes People Join Conspiracy Communities?: Role of Social Factors in Conspiracy Engagement
- Social determinants of content selection in the age of (mis)information
- Ideology and polarization set the agenda on social media
- Analyzing Behavioral Changes of Twitter Users After Exposure to Misinformation
- Polarized opinion states in static networks driven by limited information horizons
- Covid-19 infodemic reveals new tipping point epidemiology and a revised formula
- The Anatomy of Brexit Debate on Facebook
- Quickest Inference of Network Cascades with Noisy Information
- It's Always April Fools' Day! On the Difficulty of Social Network Misinformation Classification via Propagation Features
- Not sure? Handling hesitancy of COVID-19 vaccines
- Modeling confirmation bias and peer pressure in opinion dynamics
- News consumption and social media regulations policy
- Investigating Misinformation in Online Marketplaces: An Audit Study on Amazon
- MP Twitter Abuse in the Age of COVID-19: White Paper
- Towards the Modeling of Behavioral Trajectories of Users in Online Social Media
- Soros, Child Sacrifices, and 5G: Understanding the Spread of Conspiracy Theories on Web Communities
- Towards Understanding the Information Ecosystem Through the Lens of Multiple Web Communities
- Characterizing Partisan Political Narrative Frameworks about COVID-19 on Twitter
- Deterrence Effects of Social Media Interventions on Health Misinformation Dissemination by Bots and Humans
- How hate spreads online and why it returns: Re-entrant phases driven by collective behavior
- Towards Designing Social Interventions For Online Climate Change Denialism Discussions