Rumor propagation meets skepticism: a parallel with zombies

Abstract

We propose a model of rumor spreading in which susceptible, but skeptically oriented individuals may oppose the rumor. Resistance may be implemented either by skeptical activists trying to convince spreaders to stop their activity, becoming stiflers or, passively (non-reactive) as a consequence, for example, of fact-checking. Interestingly, these two mechanisms, when combined, are similar to the (assumed) spreading of a fictitious zombie outbreak, where survivors actively target infected people. We analyse the well-mixed (mean-field) description and obtain the conditions for rumors (zombies) to spread through the whole population. The results show that when the skepticism is strong enough, the model predicts the coexistence of two fixed points (such bistability may be related to polarized situations), with the fate of rumors depending on the initial exposure to it.

References in corpus (9)

• Statistical physics of social dynamics
• Epidemic processes in complex networks
• Science vs Conspiracy: collective narratives in the age of (mis)information
• Cascade Dynamics of Multiplex Propagation
• Epidemic thresholds of the Susceptible-Infected-Susceptible model on networks: A comparison of numerical and theoretical results
• Emergence of influential spreaders in modified rumor models
• Intransitivity and coexistence in four species cyclic games
• You Can Run, You Can Hide: The Epidemiology and Statistical Mechanics of Zombies
• Globally synchronized oscillations in complex cyclic games

Cited by in corpus (4)

• Skepticism and rumor spreading: the role of spatial correlations
• Criticality and Griffiths phases in random games with quenched disorder
• Coarsening in the Persistent Voter Model: analytical results
• A branching random-walk model of disease outbreaks and the percolation backbone