The Anatomy of Brexit Debate on Facebook
arXiv:1610.06809
Abstract
Nowadays users get informed and shape their opinion through social media. However, the disintermediated access to contents does not guarantee quality of information. Selective exposure and confirmation bias, indeed, have been shown to play a pivotal role in content consumption and information spreading. Users tend to select information adhering (and reinforcing) their worldview and to ignore dissenting information. This pattern elicits the formation of polarized groups -- i.e., echo chambers -- where the interaction with like-minded people might even reinforce polarization. In this work we address news consumption around Brexit in UK on Facebook. In particular, we perform a massive analysis on more than 1 Million users interacting with Brexit related posts from the main news providers between January and July 2016. We show that consumption patterns elicit the emergence of two distinct communities of news outlets. Furthermore, to better characterize inner group dynamics, we introduce a new technique which combines automatic topic extraction and sentiment analysis. We compare how the same topics are presented on posts and the related emotional response on comments finding significant differences in both echo chambers and that polarization influences the perception of topics. Our results provide important insights about the determinants of polarization and evolution of core narratives on online debating.
References in corpus (9)
- Finding community structure in very large networks
- Natural Scales in Geographical Patterns
- Near linear time algorithm to detect community structures in large-scale networks
- Extracting the multiscale backbone of complex weighted networks
- Cooperative Behavior Cascades in Human Social Networks
- Science vs Conspiracy: collective narratives in the age of (mis)information
- Emotional Dynamics in the Age of Misinformation
- An introduction to the Europe Media Monitor family of applications
- Debunking in a World of Tribes