Estimating the Mass of the Local Group using Machine Learning Applied to Numerical Simulations
arXiv:1606.02694 · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2017/12/034
Abstract
We revisit the estimation of the combined mass of the Milky Way and Andromeda (M31), which dominate the mass of the Local Group. We make use of an ensemble of 30,190 halo pairs from the Small MultiDark simulation, assuming a CDM (Cosmological Constant with Cold Dark Matter) cosmology, to investigate the relationship between the bound mass and parameters characterising the orbit of the binary and their local environment with the aid of machine learning methods (artificial neural networks, ANN). Results from the ANN are most successful when information about the velocity shear is provided, which demonstrates the flexibility of machine learning to model physical phenomena and readily incorporate new information as it becomes available. The resulting estimate for the Local Group mass, when shear information is included, is , with an error of from the 68% uncertainty in observables, and a 68% confidence interval of from the intrinsic scatter from the differences between the model and simulation masses. We also consider a recently reported large transverse velocity of M31 relative to the Milky Way, and produce an alternative mass estimate of . Although different methods predict similar values for the most likely mass of the LG, application of ANN compared to the Timing Argument reduces the scatter in the log mass by over half when tested on samples from the simulation.
20 pages, 6 figures, 5 tables
References in corpus (10)
- The M31 Velocity Vector. II. Radial Orbit Towards the Milky Way and Implied Local Group Mass
- M31 Transverse Velocity and Local Group Mass from Satellite Kinematics
- A dynamical model of the local cosmic expansion
- Cosmic web alignments with the shape, angular momentum and peculiar velocities of dark matter haloes
- Balancing mass and momentum in the Local Group
- The alignment of galaxy spin with the shear field in observations
- Galaxy properties and the cosmic web in simulations
- The Transverse velocity of the Andromeda system, derived from the M31 satellite population
- Constraining the mass of the Local Group
- The Local Group in the cosmic web
Cited by in corpus (24)
- Surveying the reach and maturity of machine learning and artificial intelligence in astronomy
- The Hestia project: simulations of the Local Group
- The Local Group Mass in the light of Gaia
- The sum of the masses of the Milky Way and M31: a likelihood-free inference approach
- Implications of the Milky Way travel velocity for dynamical mass estimates of the Local Group
- Evidence for a Massive Andromeda Galaxy Using Satellite Galaxy Proper Motions
- Constraining Dark Energy from Local Group dynamics
- Local Group timing argument and virial theorem mass estimators from cosmological simulations
- The Local Group's mass: probably no more than the sum of its parts
- Cold and Hot gas distribution around the Milky-Way-M31 system in the HESTIA simulations
- Weighing Milky Way and Andromeda in an expanding CDM Universe: Decreasing the Local Group mass
- Machine Learning Classification of Kuiper Belt Populations
- Local Group Analogs in CDM cosmological simulations
- Estimation of the masses in the Local Group by Gradient Boosted Decision Trees
- The Two Body Problem in the Presence of Dark Energy and Modified Gravity: Application to the Local Group
- Tracking the Local Group Dynamics by Extended Gravity
- Timing Argument take on the Milky Way and Andromeda past-encounter
- The Local Group as a test system for Modified Newtonian Dynamics
- Dark Energy as a Critical Period in Binary Motion: Bounds from Multi-scale Binaries
- A Machine Learning Approach to Galaxy-LSS Classification I: Imprints on Halo Merger Trees
- Dark Energy: is it `just' Einstein's Cosmological Constant Lambda?
- Line-of-Sight Velocity Projection Impact on the Local Group Mass
- Timing Mass of the Local Group
- Photometric Redshift Estimation with Convolutional Neural Networks and Galaxy Images: A Case Study of Resolving Biases in Data-Driven Methods