The mass of the Milky Way and M31 using the method of least action

Abstract

We constrain the most likely range of masses for the Milky Way and M31 using an application of the Numerical Action Method (NAM) that optimizes the fit to observed parameters over a large ensemble of NAM-generated solutions. Our 95% confidence level mass ranges, 1.5-4.5 x 10^12 m_sun for MW and 1.5-5.5 x 10^12 m_sun for M31, are consistent with the upper range of estimates from other methods and suggests that a larger proportion of the total mass becomes detectable when the peculiar motions of many nearby satellites are taken into account in the dynamical analysis. We test the method against simulated Local Group catalogs extracted from the Millennium Run to confirm that mass predictions are consistent with actual galaxy halo masses.

2 figures

References in corpus (4)

• The hierarchical formation of the brightest cluster galaxies
• The M31 Velocity Vector. II. Radial Orbit Towards the Milky Way and Implied Local Group Mass
• The Space Motion of Leo I: The Mass of the Milky Way's Dark Matter Halo
• The Space Motion of Leo I: Hubble Space Telescope Proper Motion and Implied Orbit

Cited by in corpus (31)

• A Multi-Band Catalog of 10978 Star Clusters, Associations and Candidates in the Milky Way
• The relative and absolute ages of old globular clusters in the LCDM framework
• Balancing mass and momentum in the Local Group
• On Testing the Equivalence Principle with Extragalactic Bursts
• Origin of the Local Group satellite planes
• Comprehensive Assessment of the Too-Big-to-Fail Problem
• The Local Group Mass in the light of Gaia
• The sum of the masses of the Milky Way and M31: a likelihood-free inference approach
• The SIBELIUS Project: E Pluribus Unum
• Constraining the mass of the Local Group
• Using Velocity Dispersion to Estimate Halo Mass: Is the Local Group in Tension with $\Lambda$CDM?
• Estimating the Mass of the Local Group using Machine Learning Applied to Numerical Simulations
• Evidence for a Massive Andromeda Galaxy Using Satellite Galaxy Proper Motions
• Lyman-α Emitters in the context of hierarchical galaxy formation: predictions for VLT/MUSE surveys
• Not a Copernican observer: biased peculiar velocity statistics in the local Universe
• Local Group timing argument and virial theorem mass estimators from cosmological simulations
• A Lower Limit on the Mass of Our Galaxy from the H3 Survey
• Sizing from the Smallest Scales: The Mass of the Milky Way
• The Two Body Problem in the Presence of Dark Energy and Modified Gravity: Application to the Local Group
• Uneven flows: On cosmic bulk flows, local observers, and gravity
• On the absence of backsplash analogues to NGC 3109 in the $\Lambda$CDM framework
• The Local Group as a test system for Modified Newtonian Dynamics
• Timing Argument take on the Milky Way and Andromeda past-encounter
• Dark Energy as a Critical Period in Binary Motion: Bounds from Multi-scale Binaries
• Measuring the Mass of Missing Baryons in the Halo of Andromeda Galaxy with Gamma-Ray Observations
• Testing the weak equivalence principle with the binary neutron star merger GW170817: the gravitational contribution of the host galaxy
• Is the stellar mass-stellar metallicity relation universal in the Milky Way satellites and beyond?
• The Milky Way and M31 Orbital History: Did the Local Group evolve in isolation?
• Timing Mass of the Local Group
• Detection prospects for the GW background of Galactic (sub)solar mass primordial black holes
• Dynamics of The Tranquil Cosmic Web