A Comparison of Spectroscopic versus Imaging Techniques for Detecting Close Companions to Kepler Objects of Interest

Abstract

(Abbreviated) Kepler planet candidates require both spectroscopic and imaging follow-up observations to rule out false positives and detect blended stars. [...] In this paper, we examine a sample of 11 Kepler host stars with companions detected by two techniques -- near-infrared adaptive optics and/or optical speckle interferometry imaging, and a new spectroscopic deblending method. We compare the companion Teff and flux ratios (F_B/F_A, where A is the primary and B is the companion) derived from each technique, and find no cases where both companion parameters agree within 1sigma errors. In 3/11 cases the companion Teff values agree within 1sigma errors, and in 2/11 cases the companion F_B/F_A values agree within 1sigma errors. Examining each Kepler system individually considering multiple avenues (isochrone mapping, contrast curves, probability of being bound), we suggest two cases for which the techniques most likely agree in their companion detections (detect the same companion star). Overall, our results support the advantage the spectroscopic deblending technique has for finding very close-in companions ($\theta \lesssim$0.02-0.05") that are not easily detectable with imaging. However, we also specifically show how high-contrast AO and speckle imaging observations detect companions at larger separations ($\theta \ge$0.02-0.05") that are missed by the spectroscopic technique, provide additional information for characterizing the companion and its potential contamination (e.g., PA, separation, $\Delta$m), and cover a wider range of primary star effective temperatures. The investigation presented here illustrates the utility of combining the two techniques to reveal higher-order multiples in known planet-hosting systems.

Accepted to AJ. 40 pages, 12 figures

References in corpus (14)

• Most 1.6 Earth-Radius Planets are not Rocky
• The Transiting Circumbinary Planets Kepler-34 and Kepler-35
• Steady-state planet migration by the Kozai-Lidov mechanism in stellar binaries
• Friends of Hot Jupiters II: No Correspondence Between Hot-Jupiter Spin-Orbit Misalignment and the Incidence of Directly Imaged Stellar Companions
• Influence of Stellar Multiplicity On Planet Formation. II. Planets Are Less Common in Multiple-Star Systems with Separations Smaller than 1500 AU
• High-resolution imaging of $Kepler$ planet host candidates. A comprehensive comparison of different techniques
• Most Sub-Arcsecond Companions of Kepler Exoplanet Candidate Host Stars are Gravitationally Bound
• Binarity as a key factor in protoplanetary disk evolution: Spitzer disk census of the eta Chamaeleontis cluster
• On the Occurrence Rate of Hot Jupiters in Different Stellar Environments
• Occurrence and core-envelope structure of 1--4x Earth-size planets around Sun-like stars
• Detection of Stars within $\sim$0.8 arcseconds of Kepler Objects of Interest
• High-resolution Multi-band Imaging for Validation and Characterization of Small Kepler Planets
• The Occurrence of Wide-Orbit Planets in Binary Star Systems
• Adaptive Optics Images III: 87 Kepler Objects of Interest

Cited by in corpus (13)

• The Impact of Stellar Multiplicity on Planetary Systems, I.: The Ruinous Influence of Close Binary Companions
• The Kepler Follow-Up Observation Program. I. A Catalog of Companions to Kepler Stars from High-Resolution Imaging
• 197 Candidates and 104 Validated Planets in K2's First Five Fields
• Observations of Binary Stars with the Differential Speckle Survey Instrument. VII. Measures from 2010 September to 2012 February at the WIYN Telescope
• Robo-AO Kepler Planetary Candidate Survey II: Adaptive Optics Imaging of 969 Kepler Exoplanet Candidate Host Stars
• The Densities of Planets in Multiple Stellar Systems
• Speckle Imaging Excludes Low-Mass Companions Orbiting the Exoplanet Host Star TRAPPIST-1
• Friends of Hot Jupiters III: An Infrared Spectroscopic Search for Low-Mass Stellar Companions
• Unresolved Binary Exoplanet Host Stars Fit as Single Stars: Effects on the Stellar Parameters
• The Kepler Follow-Up Observation Program. II. Stellar Parameters from Medium- and High-Resolution Spectroscopy
• A Closer Look at Exoplanet Occurrence Rates: Considering the Multiplicity of Stars Without Detected Planets
• Stellar Companions to the Exoplanet Host Stars HD 2638 and HD 164509
• Glimpses of stellar surfaces. II. Origins of the photometric modulations and timing variations of KOI-1452