Correcting the z~8 Galaxy Luminosity Function for Gravitational Lensing Magnification Bias

Abstract

We present a Bayesian framework to account for the magnification bias from both strong and weak gravitational lensing in estimates of high-redshift galaxy luminosity functions. We illustrate our method by estimating the $z\sim 8$ UV luminosity function using a sample of 97 Y-band dropouts (Lyman break galaxies) found in the Brightest of Reionizing Galaxies (BoRG) survey and from the literature. We find the luminosity function is well described by a Schechter function with characteristic magnitude of $M^{\star }=-19.85_{-0.35}^{+0.30}$, faint-end slope of $\alpha =-1.72_{-0.29}^{+0.30}$, and number density of ${\log }_{10}{\Psi }^{\star }[{\text{Mpc}}^{-3}]=-3.00_{-0.31}^{+0.23}$. These parameters are consistent within the uncertainties with those inferred from the same sample without accounting for the magnification bias, demonstrating that the effect is small for current surveys at $z\sim 8$, and cannot account for the apparent overdensity of bright galaxies compared to a Schechter function found recently by Bowler et al. (2014a,b) and Finkelstein et al. (2014). We estimate that the probability of finding a strongly lensed $z\sim 8$ source in our sample is in the range $\sim 3-15\%$ depending on limiting magnitude. We identify one strongly-lensed candidate and three cases of intermediate lensing in BoRG (estimated magnification $\mu >1.4$) in addition to the previously known candidate group-scale strong lens. Using a range of theoretical luminosity functions we conclude that magnification bias will dominate wide field surveys -- such as those planned for the Euclid and WFIRST missions -- especially at $z>10$. Magnification bias will need to be accounted for in order to derive accurate estimates of high-redshift luminosity functions in these surveys and to distinguish between galaxy formation models.

Accepted for publication in ApJ. 20 pages, 13 figures

References in corpus (18)

• The James Webb Space Telescope
• UV Luminosity Functions at z~4, 5, and 6 from the HUDF and other Deep HST ACS Fields: Evolution and Star Formation History
• Galaxies in the Hubble Ultra Deep Field: I. Detection, Multiband Photometry, Photometric Redshifts, and Morphology
• Hubble Space Telescope Combined Strong and Weak Lensing Analysis of the CLASH Sample: Mass and Magnification Models and Systematic Uncertainties
• The high redshift galaxy population in hierarchical galaxy formation models
• Analytic models of plausible gravitational lens potentials
• A Simple Technique for Predicting High-Redshift Galaxy Evolution
• New Constraints on the Faint-end of the UV Luminosity Function at z~7-8 using the Gravitational Lensing of the Hubble Frontier Fields Cluster A2744
• Strong lensing optical depths in a \LambdaCDM universe
• Frontier Fields: High-Redshift Predictions and Early Results
• The Luminosity Function at z~8 from 97 Y-band dropouts: Inferences About Reionization
• MOSFIRE Absorption Line Spectroscopy of z > 2 Quiescent Galaxies: Probing a Period of Rapid Size Growth
• A physical model for the evolving UV luminosity function of high redshift galaxies and their contribution to the cosmic reionization
• A Flexible Method of Estimating Luminosity Functions
• One Plane for All: Massive Star-Forming and Quiescent Galaxies Lie on the Same Mass Fundamental Plane at z~0 and z~0.7
• The Impact of Strong Gravitational Lensing on Observed Lyman-Break Galaxy Numbers at 4<z<8 in the GOODS and the XDF Blank Fields
• The Fundamental Plane of massive quiescent galaxies out to z~2
• Distortion of the luminosity function of high-redshift galaxies by gravitational lensing

Cited by in corpus (16)

• Two Remarkably Luminous Galaxy Candidates at $z\approx 10-12$ Revealed by JWST
• The Impact of Strong Gravitational Lensing on Observed Lyman-Break Galaxy Numbers at 4<z<8 in the GOODS and the XDF Blank Fields
• The Brightest Galaxies at Cosmic Dawn from Scatter in the Galaxy Luminosity versus Halo Mass Relation
• Simulating JWST deep extragalactic imaging surveys and physical parameter recovery
• COSMOS2020: UV selected galaxies at $z\ge 7.5$
• Revisiting the Lensed Fraction of High-Redshift Quasars
• A Survey for High-redshift Gravitationally Lensed Quasars and Close Quasars Pairs. I. the Discoveries of an Intermediately-lensed Quasar and a Kpc-scale Quasar Pair at $z\sim 5$
• The rapid transition from star-formation to AGN dominated rest-frame UV light at z ~ 4
• Streamlined Lensed Quasar Identification in Multiband Images via Ensemble Networks
• Distortion of the luminosity function of high-redshift galaxies by gravitational lensing
• Merger-driven evolution of the effective stellar initial mass function of massive early-type galaxies
• The weak dependence of velocity dispersion on disk fractions, mass-to-light ratio and redshift: Implications for galaxy and black hole evolution
• Reality or Mirage? Observational Test and Implications for the Claimed Extremely Magnified Quasar at $z=6.3$
• Unresolved z~8 point sources and their impact on the bright end of the galaxy luminosity function
• Characterizing elusive, faint dusty star-forming galaxies: a lensed, optically undetected ALMA galaxy at z~3.3
• A Search for Lensed Lyman-Alpha Emitters within the Early HETDEX Data Set