Comparison of a quantum error correction threshold for exact and approximate errors
arXiv:1501.00068 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.91.022335
Abstract
Classical simulations of noisy stabilizer circuits are often used to estimate the threshold of a quantum error-correcting code. Physical noise sources are efficiently approximated by random insertions of Pauli operators. For a single qubit, more accurate approximations that still allow for efficient simulation can be obtained by including Clifford operators and Pauli operators conditional on measurement in the noise model. We examine the feasibility of employing these expanded error approximations to obtain better threshold estimates. We calculate the level-1 pseudothreshold for the Steane [[7,1,3]] code for amplitude damping and dephasing along a non-Clifford axis. The expanded channels estimate the actual channel action more accurately than the Pauli channels before error correction. However, after error correction, the Pauli twirling approximation yields very accurate estimates of the performance of quantum error-correcting protocols in the presence of the actual noise channel.
10 pages, 4 figures, 7 tables (v2. fixes typos in references)
References in corpus (6)
- Experimental Quantum Computations on a Topologically Encoded Qubit
- Low-distance Surface Codes under Realistic Quantum Noise
- Fault-tolerant conversion between the Steane and Reed-Muller quantum codes
- Optimal and Efficient Decoding of Concatenated Quantum Block Codes
- Approximation of real error channels by Clifford channels and Pauli measurements
- Surface Code Threshold in the Presence of Correlated Errors