Unbiased Correction Relations for Galaxy Cluster properties Derived from Chandra and XMM-Newton
arXiv:1411.4259 · doi:10.1088/0004-637X/799/1/47
Abstract
We use a sample of 62 clusters of galaxies to investigate the discrepancies of gas temperature and total mass within r500 between XMM-Newton and Chandra data. Comparisons of the properties show that: (1) Both the de-projected and projected temperatures determined by Chandra are higher than those of XMM-Newton and there is a good linear relation for the de-projected temperature. (2) The Chandra mass is much higher than XMM-Newton mass with a bias of 0.15. To explore the reasons for the discrepancy in mass, we recalculate the Chandra mass (expressed as M_c) by modifying its temperature with the de-projected temperature relation. The results show that M_c is more close to the XMM-Newton mass with the bias reducing to 0.02. Moreover, M_c are corrected with the r500 measured by XMM-Newton and the intrinsic scatter is significantly improved with the value reducing from 0.20 to 0.12. These mean that the temperature bias may be the main factor causing the mass bias. At last, we find that M_c is consistent with the corresponding XMM-Newton mass derived directly from our mass relation at a given Chandra mass. Thus, the de-projected temperature and mass relations can provide unbiased corrections for galaxy cluster properties derived from Chandra and XMM-Newton.
accepted for publication in ApJ
References in corpus (22)
- Cosmological Parameters from Observations of Galaxy Clusters
- Chandra Cluster Cosmology Project III: Cosmological Parameter Constraints
- Galaxy cluster X-ray luminosity scaling relations from a representative local sample (REXCESS)
- The ROSAT-ESO Flux Limited X-ray (REFLEX) Galaxy Cluster Survey. V. The cluster catalogue
- Chandra temperature profiles for a sample of nearby relaxed galaxy clusters
- A Catalog of Galaxy Clusters Observed by XMM-Newton
- Statistics of X-ray observables for the cooling-core and non-cooling core galaxy clusters
- Joint Analysis of Cluster Observations: II. Chandra/XMM-Newton X-ray and Weak Lensing Scaling Relations for a Sample of 50 Rich Clusters of Galaxies
- LoCuSS: Comparison of Observed X-ray and Lensing Galaxy Cluster Scaling Relations with Simulations
- LoCuSS: A Comparison of Cluster Mass Measurements from XMM-Newton and Subaru - Testing Deviation from Hydrostatic Equilibrium and Non-Thermal Pressure Support
- Cosmological Constraints from Galaxy Clustering and the Mass-to-Number Ratio of Galaxy Clusters
- Cross-calibrating X-ray detectors with clusters of galaxies: an IACHEC study
- X-ray properties in massive galaxy clusters: XMM-Newton observations of the REFLEX-DXL sample
- X-ray and Sunyaev-Zel'dovich scaling relations in galaxy clusters
- Scaling relations and mass calibration of the X-ray luminous galaxy clusters at z~0.2: XMM-Newton observations
- XMM-Newton Observations of Evolution of Cluster X-Ray Scaling Relations at z=0.4-0.7
- Distant galaxy clusters in the XMM Large Scale Structure survey
- Impact of Chandra calibration uncertainties on galaxy cluster temperatures: application to the Hubble Constant
- An XMM-Newton study of the RGH 80 galaxy group
- A good mass proxy for galaxy clusters with XMM-Newton
- The analysis of Abell 1835 using a deprojection technique
- Deprojected analysis of Abell 1835 observed with Chandra and compared with XMM-Newton
Cited by in corpus (4)
- The scaling relations and the fundamental plane for radio halos and relics of galaxy clusters
- A New Interpretation of the Mass-Temperature Relation and Mass Calibration of Galaxy Clusters Based on the Fundamental Plane
- A Chandra Study of the Image Power Spectra of 41 Cool Core and Non-Cool Core Galaxy Clusters
- The scaling relation and its difference between cool-core and non-cool-core clusters