Fragility of the Commons under Prospect-Theoretic Risk Attitudes

Abstract

We study a common-pool resource game where the resource experiences failure with a probability that grows with the aggregate investment in the resource. To capture decision making under such uncertainty, we model each player's risk preference according to the value function from prospect theory. We show the existence and uniqueness of a pure Nash equilibrium when the players have heterogeneous risk preferences and under certain assumptions on the rate of return and failure probability of the resource. Greater competition, vis-a-vis the number of players, increases the failure probability at the Nash equilibrium; we quantify this effect by obtaining bounds on the ratio of the failure probability at the Nash equilibrium to the failure probability under investment by a single user. We further show that heterogeneity in attitudes towards loss aversion leads to higher failure probability of the resource at the equilibrium.

Accepted for publication in Games and Economic Behavior, 2016

Cited by in corpus (9)

• Interdependent Security Games on Networks under Behavioral Probability Weighting
• Prospect-theoretic Q-learning
• Optimal control policies for evolutionary dynamics with environmental feedback
• Controlling Human Utilization of Failure-Prone Systems via Taxes
• Incentivizing Collaboration in Heterogeneous Teams via Common-Pool Resource Games
• Smart Routing of Electric Vehicles for Load Balancing in Smart Grids
• Cumulative Prospect Theory Based Dynamic Pricing for Shared Mobility on Demand Services
• Game-Theoretic Choice of Curing Rates Against Networked SIS Epidemics by Human Decision-Makers
• Game-Theoretic Vaccination Against Networked SIS Epidemics and Impacts of Human Decision-Making