How well is our universe described by an FLRW model?

Abstract

Extremely well! In the $\Lambda$CDM model, the spacetime metric, $g_{ab}$, of our universe is approximated by an FLRW metric, $g_{ab}^{(0)}$, to about 1 part in $10^4$ or better on both large and small scales, except in the immediate vicinity of very strong field objects, such as black holes. However, derivatives of $g_{ab}$ are not close to derivatives of $g_{ab}^{(0)}$, so there can be significant differences in the behavior of geodesics and huge differences in curvature. Consequently, observable quantities in the actual universe may differ significantly from the corresponding observables in the FLRW model. Nevertheless, as we shall review here, we have proven general results showing that---within the framework of our approach to treating backreaction---the large matter inhomogeneities that occur on small scales cannot produce significant effects on large scales, so $g_{ab}^{(0)}$ satisfies Einstein's equation with the averaged stress-energy tensor of matter as its source. We discuss the flaws in some other approaches that have suggested that large backreaction effects may occur. As we also will review here, with a suitable "dictionary," Newtonian cosmologies provide excellent approximations to cosmological solutions to Einstein's equation (with dust and a cosmological constant) on all scales. Our results thereby provide strong justification for the mathematical consistency and validity of the $\Lambda$CDM model within the context of general relativistic cosmology.

Invited contribution to a Classical and Quantum Gravity focus issue on "Relativistic Effects in Cosmology", edited by Kazuya Koyama; 18 pages, 2 figures. V2: References added and minor wording changes made

References in corpus (2)

• A new framework for analyzing the effects of small scale inhomogeneities in cosmology
• Unified treatment of cosmological perturbations from super-horizon to small scales

Cited by in corpus (28)

• Concordance cosmology without dark energy
• Testing nonlocal gravity with Lunar Laser Ranging
• Another look at redshift drift and the backreaction conjecture
• Implications of Symmetry and Pressure in Friedmann Cosmology. I. Formalism
• Cosmology Intertwined: A Review of the Particle Physics, Astrophysics, and Cosmology Associated with the Cosmological Tensions and Anomalies
• Do supernovae indicate an accelerating universe?
• An effective description of Laniakea: impact on cosmology and the local determination of the Hubble constant
• Backreaction in Cosmology
• Backreaction and FRW consistency conditions
• Machine learning cosmic backreaction and its effects on observations
• Example of an inhomogeneous cosmological model in the context of backreaction
• Testing averaged cosmology with type Ia supernovae and BAO data
• Comment on "Observational Evidence for Cosmological Coupling of Black Holes and its Implications for an Astrophysical Source of Dark Energy"
• Cosmology using numerical relativity
• A novel approach to cosmological non-linearities as an effective fluid
• The Method of Self-Consistent Field and Macroscopical Einstein Equations for the Early Universe
• Modelling the emergence of cosmic anisotropy from non-linear structures
• Well-defined equations of motion without constraint of external sources
• Evaluating backreaction with the ellipsoidal collapse model
• On the intrinsically flat cosmological models in a lattice
• Primordial gravitational waves from spontaneous Lorentz symmetry breaking
• Short-wave Approximation For Macroscopic Cosmology with Higgs Scalar Field
• PySCo: A fast Particle-Mesh $N$-body code for modified gravity simulations in Python
• Backreaction and the Role of Spatial Curvature in the Cosmic Neighborhood
• Super-horizon effects on the gauge invariant effective energy density in f(R) gravity
• Les Houches on Dark Universe 2025: Elements of cosmology beyond FLRW
• Cosmic Dipoles from Large-Scale Structure Surveys
• Nonlinear Lattice Framework for Inflation: Bridging stochastic inflation and the $\delta N$ formalism