The pre-processing of subhaloes in SDSS groups and clusters
arXiv:1404.7504 · doi:10.1093/mnras/stu829
Abstract
We investigate pre-processing using the observed quenched fraction of group and cluster galaxies in the Yang et al. (2007) SDSS-DR7 group catalogue in the redshift range of 0.01 < z < 0.045. We categorize group galaxies as virialized, infall or backsplash and we apply a combination of the Dressler-Shectman statistic and group member velocities to identify subhaloes. On average the fraction of galaxies that reside in subhaloes is a function of host halo mass, where more massive systems have a higher fraction of subhalo galaxies both in the overall galaxy and infall populations. Additionally, we find that between 2 < r_200 < 3 the quiescent fraction is higher in the subhalo population with respect to both the field and non-subhalo populations. At these large radii (2 < r_200 < 3), the majority of galaxies (~ 80 %) belong to the infall population and therefore, we attribute the enhanced quenching to infalling subhalo galaxies, indicating that pre-processing has occurred in the subhalo population. We conclude that pre-processing plays a significant role in the observed quiescent fraction, but only for the most massive (M_halo > 10^14.5 M_sun) systems in our sample.
14 pages, 11 figures, accepted for publication in MNRAS
References in corpus (9)
- Mass and environment as drivers of galaxy evolution in SDSS and zCOSMOS and the origin of the Schechter function
- K-corrections and filter transformations in the ultraviolet, optical, and near infrared
- Galaxy Groups in the SDSS DR4: I. The Catalogue and Basic Properties
- Galaxy Zoo: the dependence of morphology and colour on environment
- Strangulation in Galaxy Groups
- Dependence of Galaxy Quenching on Halo Mass and Distance from its Centre
- The Correlation of Star Formation Quenching with Internal Galaxy Properties and Environment
- The Assembly of Galaxy Clusters
- The origin of HI-deficiency in galaxies on the outskirts of the Virgo cluster. I. How far can galaxies bounce out of clusters?
Cited by in corpus (19)
- Star formation quenching in simulated group and cluster galaxies: When, how, and why?
- Assessing Colour-dependent Occupation Statistics Inferred from Galaxy Group Catalogues
- Physical properties of SDSS satellite galaxies in projected phase-space
- LoTSS jellyfish galaxies: II. Ram pressure stripping in groups versus clusters
- LoCuSS: Pre-processing in galaxy groups falling into massive galaxy clusters at z=0.2
- The Three Hundred Project: Ram pressure and gas content of haloes and subhaloes in the phase-space plane
- Quenching low-mass satellite galaxies: evidence for a threshold ICM density
- Evidence of pre-processing and a dependence on dynamical state for low-mass satellite galaxies
- The Next Generation Virgo Cluster Survey (NGVS). XXIV. The Red Sequence to 10 L and Comparisons with Galaxy Formation Models
- Conditional Quenching: A detailed look at the SFR-Density Relation at z ~ 0.9 from ORELSE
- The GOGREEN survey: Dependence of galaxy properties on halo mass at z > 1 and implications for environmental quenching
- Mass segregation trends in SDSS galaxy groups
- The Next Generation Virgo Cluster Survey. IX. Estimating the Efficiency of Galaxy Formation on the Lowest-Mass Scales
- The Three Hundred Project: The gas disruption of infalling objects in cluster environments
- Satellite galaxies in groups in the CIELO Project I. Gas removal from galaxies and its re-distribution in the intragroup medium
- Reconstructing Orbits of Galaxies in Extreme Regions (ROGER) II: reliability of projected phase-space in our understanding of galaxy populations
- Star formation histories of Coma Cluster galaxies matched to simulated orbits hint at quenching around first pericenter
- Scatter in the satellite galaxy SHMR: fitting functions, scaling relations & physical processes from the IllustrisTNG simulation
- Critical Stellar Central Densities Drive Galaxy Quenching in the Nearby Universe