A New Method for Analysing Dark Matter Direct Detection Data

Abstract

The experimental situation of Dark Matter Direct Detection has reached an exciting cross-roads, with potential hints of a discovery of Dark Matter (DM) from the CDMS, CoGeNT, CRESST-II and DAMA experiments in tension with null-results from xenon-based experiments such as XENON100 and LUX. Given the present controversial experimental status, it is important that the analytical method used to search for DM in Direct Detection experiments is both robust and flexible enough to deal with data for which the distinction between signal and background points is difficult, and hence where the choice between setting a limit or defining a discovery region is debatable. In this article we propose a novel (Bayesian) analytical method, which can be applied to all Direct Detection experiments and which extracts the maximum amount of information from the data. We apply our method to the XENON100 experiment data as a worked example, and show that firstly our exclusion limit at 90% confidence is in agreement with their own for the 225 Live Days data, but is several times stronger for the 100 Live Days data. Secondly we find that, due to the two points at low values of S1 and S2 in the 225 days data-set, our analysis points to either weak consistency with low-mass Dark Matter or the possible presence of an unknown background. Given the null-result from LUX, the latter scenario seems the more plausible.

v3: Updated to match version accepted to PRD. Contains a discussion now also of the LUX experiment. 10 pages, 3 figures

References in corpus (15)

• Dark Matter Results from 225 Live Days of XENON100 Data
• New results from DAMA/LIBRA
• Results from 730 kg days of the CRESST-II Dark Matter Search
• First Dark Matter Results from the XENON100 Experiment
• WIMP-nucleon cross-section results from the second science run of ZEPLIN-III
• The unbearable lightness of being: CDMS versus XENON
• XENON10/100 dark matter constraints in comparison with CoGeNT and DAMA: examining the Leff dependence
• Light Magnetic Dark Matter in Direct Detection Searches
• Response of the XENON100 Dark Matter Detector to Nuclear Recoils
• A coherent understanding of low-energy nuclear recoils in liquid xenon
• The neutron background of the XENON100 dark matter experiment
• Direct detection experiments explained with mirror dark matter
• Revisiting XENON100's Constraints (and Signals?) For Low-Mass Dark Matter
• Importance of upgraded energy reconstruction for direct dark matter searches with liquid xenon detectors
• The XENON100 exclusion limit without considering Leff as a nuisance parameter

Cited by in corpus (5)

• Characterising dark matter searches at colliders and direct detection experiments: Vector mediators
• Dark Matter vs. Neutrinos: The effect of astrophysical uncertainties and timing information on the neutrino floor
• Information Field Theory and Artificial Intelligence
• Bayesian technique to combine independently-trained Machine-Learning models applied to direct dark matter detection
• Bayesian analysis of multiple direct detection experiments