Modes of clustered star formation

Abstract

The realization that most stars form in clusters, raises the question of whether star/planet formation are influenced by the cluster environment. The stellar density in the most prevalent clusters is the key factor here. Whether dominant modes of clustered star formation exist is a fundamental question. Using near-neighbour searches in young clusters Bressert et al. (2010) claim this not to be the case and conclude that star formation is continuous from isolated to densely clustered. We investigate under which conditions near-neighbour searches can distinguish between different modes of clustered star formation. Near-neighbour searches are performed for model star clusters investigating the influence of the combination of different cluster modes, observational biases, and types of diagnostic and find that the cluster density profile, the relative sample sizes, limitations in observations and the choice of diagnostic method decides whether modelled modes of clustered star formation are detected. For centrally concentrated density distributions spanning a wide density range (King profiles) separate cluster modes are only detectable if the mean density of the individual clusters differs by at least a factor of ~65. Introducing a central cut-off can lead to underestimating the mean density by more than a factor of ten. The environmental effect on star and planet formation is underestimated for half of the population in dense systems. A analysis of a sample of cluster environments involves effects of superposition that suppress characteristic features and promotes erroneous conclusions. While multiple peaks in the distribution of the local surface density imply the existence of different modes, the reverse conclusion is not possible. Equally, a smooth distribution is not a proof of continuous star formation, because such a shape can easily hide modes of clustered star formation (abridged)

9 pages, 6 figures, accepted by A&A

References in corpus (9)

• A Spitzer Survey of Young Stellar Clusters within One Kiloparsec of the Sun: Cluster Core Extraction and Basic Structural Analysis
• Star formation through gravitational collapse and competitive accretion
• The Importance of Radiative Feedback for the Stellar Initial Mass Function
• The Formation of the First Stars II. Radiative Feedback Processes and Implications for the Initial Mass Function
• Equilibrium Star Cluster Formation
• The Initial Mass Function of the Massive Star-forming Region NGC 3603 from Near-Infrared Adaptive Optics observations
• The Evolution of the Multiplicity of Embedded Protostars II: Binary Separation Distribution & Analysis
• The Fate of Discs around Massive Stars in Young Clusters
• Cluster-assisted accretion for massive stars

Cited by in corpus (16)

• The Big Problems in Star Formation: the Star Formation Rate, Stellar Clustering, and the Initial Mass Function
• The Spatial Structure of Young Stellar Clusters. I. Subclusters
• The mmax-Mecl relation, the IMF and IGIMF: probabilistically sampled functions?
• SPICY: The Spitzer/IRAC Candidate YSO Catalog for the Inner Galactic Midplane
• Not all stars form in clusters - measuring the kinematics of OB associations with $Gaia$
• Local-Density Driven Clustered Star Formation
• Did the infant R136 and NGC 3603 clusters undergo residual gas expulsion?
• The Spatial Structure of Young Stellar Clusters. II. Total Young Stellar Populations
• Binaries in the field: fossils of the star formation process?
• The Spatial Structure of Young Stellar Clusters. III. Physical Properties and Evolutionary States
• Discovery of a young stellar "snake" with two dissolving cores in the solar neighborhood
• Low Mass Stars as Tracers of Star and Cluster Formation
• S2D2: Small-scale Significant substructure DBSCAN Detection I. NESTs detection in 2D star-forming regions
• Subaru Hyper Suprime-Cam Survey of Cygnus OB2 Complex -- I: Introduction, Photometry and Source Catalog
• Observational Bias and Young Massive Cluster Characterisation I. 2D Perspective Effects
• The Spatial Evolution of Young Massive Clusters III. Effect of the Gaia Filter on 2D Spatial Distribution Studies