Reconstructing the Arches I: Constraining the Initial Conditions
arXiv:0911.3058 · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17326.x
Abstract
We have performed a series of N-body simulations to model the Arches cluster. Our aim is to find the best fitting model for the Arches cluster by comparing our simulations with observational data and to constrain the parameters for the initial conditions of the cluster. By neglecting the Galactic potential and stellar evolution, we are able to efficiently search through a large parameter space to determine e.g. the IMF, size, and mass of the cluster. We find, that the cluster's observed present-day mass function can be well explained with an initial Salpeter IMF. The lower mass-limit of the IMF cannot be well constrained from our models. In our best models, the total mass and the virial radius of the cluster are initially (5.1 +/- 0.8) 10^4 Msun and 0.76 +/- 0.12 pc, respectively. The concentration parameter of the initial King model is w0 = 3-5.
12 pages, 14 Figures, revised and accepted for publication in MNRAS
References in corpus (6)
- Young massive star clusters
- A Universal Stellar Initial Mass Function? A Critical Look at Variations
- The most massive stars in the Arches cluster
- The Initial Mass Function of the Massive Star-forming Region NGC 3603 from Near-Infrared Adaptive Optics observations
- The Arches Cluster Mass Function
- The proper motion of the Arches cluster with Keck Laser-Guide Star Adaptive Optics
Cited by in corpus (31)
- An excess of massive stars in the local 30 Doradus starburst
- The ages of young star clusters, massive blue stragglers and the upper mass limit of stars: analysing age dependent stellar mass functions
- The Spatial Structure of Young Stellar Clusters. I. Subclusters
- Evolution of Mass Functions of Coeval Stars through Wind Mass Loss and Binary Interactions
- The Unusual Initial Mass Function of the Arches Cluster
- Proper motions of the Arches cluster with Keck-LGS Adaptive Optics: the first kinematic mass measurement of the Arches
- Traces of past activity in the Galactic Centre
- Nonthermal X-rays from low-energy cosmic rays: Application to the 6.4 keV line emission from the Arches cluster region
- The bound fraction of young star clusters
- Direct N-body simulations of globular clusters: (I) Palomar 14
- Which feedback mechanisms dominate in the high-pressure environment of the Central Molecular Zone?
- Tracing the Conversion of Gas into Stars in Young Massive Cluster Progenitors
- Nitrogen-enriched, highly-pressurized nebular clouds surrounding a super star cluster at cosmic noon
- The Arches cluster out to its tidal radius: dynamical mass segregation and the effect of the extinction law on the stellar mass function
- The Evolution of Protoplanetary Disks in the Arches Cluster
- Young massive star cluster formation in the Galactic Centre is driven by global gravitational collapse of high-mass molecular clouds
- Isolated massive stars in the Galactic center: The dynamic contribution from the Arches and Quintuplet star clusters
- Deep near-infrared imaging of W3 Main: constraints on stellar cluster formation
- Circumstellar discs in Galactic centre clusters: Disc-bearing B-type stars in the Quintuplet and Arches clusters
- Modes of clustered star formation
- Close stellar flybys common in low-mass clusters
- Inferring the parallax of Westerlund 1 from Gaia DR2
- Treatment of realistic tidal field in Monte Carlo simulations of star clusters
- Creating retrogradely orbiting planets by prograde stellar fly-bys
- Testing multi-mass dynamical models of star clusters with real data: mass segregation in three Galactic globular clusters
- Near-infrared spectroscopy of the massive stellar population of W51: evidence for multi-seeded star formation
- The absolute proper motions of the Arches and Quintuplet clusters
- On the Effects of Subvirial Initial Conditions and the Birth Temperature of R136
- Molecular Clouds: Internal Properties, Turbulence, Star Formation and Feedback
- Effect of accreting tidally disrupted stars on the spin evolution of black holes
- How well do STARLAB and NBODY compare? II: Hardware and accuracy