Observational Bias and Young Massive Cluster Characterisation I. 2D Perspective Effects

Abstract

Understanding the formation and evolution of high mass star clusters requires comparisons between theoretical and observational data to be made. Unfortunately, while the full phase space of simulated regions is available, often only partial 2D spatial and kinematic data is available for observed regions. This raises the question as to whether cluster parameters determined from 2D data alone are reliable and representative of clusters real parameters and the impact of line-of-sight orientation. In this paper we derive parameters for a simulated cluster formed from a cloud-cloud collision with the full 6D phase space, and compare them with those derived from three different 2D line-of-sight orientations for the cluster. We show the same qualitative conclusions can be reached when viewing clusters in 2D versus 3D, but that drawing quantitative conclusions when viewing in 2D is likely to be inaccurate. The greatest divergence occurs in the perceived kinematics of the cluster, which in some orientations appears to be expanding when the cluster is actually contracting. Increases in the cluster density compounds pre-existing perspective issues, reducing the relative accuracy and consistency of properties derived from different orientations. This is particularly problematic for determination of the number, and membership, of subclusters present in the cluster. We find the fraction of subclusters correctly identified in 2D decreases as the cluster evolves, reaching less than 3.4% at the evolutionary end point for our cluster.

16 pages, 10 figures, 1 table. Accepted for publication in MNRAS

References in corpus (15)

• Clusters and mirages: cataloguing stellar aggregates in the Milky Way
• PeTar: a high-performance N-body code for modeling massive collisional stellar systems
• Do O-stars form in isolation?
• Stellar clusterings around "Isolated" Massive YSOs in the LMC
• Unlocking Galactic Wolf-Rayet stars with $\text{Gaia}$ DR2 II: Cluster and Association membership
• The formation of young massive clusters by colliding flows
• The Spatial Evolution of Young Massive Clusters I. A New Tool to Quantitatively Trace Stellar Clustering
• The role of collision speed, cloud density, and turbulence in the formation of young massive clusters via cloud-cloud collisions
• Morphology of Open Clusters NGC 1857 and Czernik 20 using Clustering Algorithms
• S2D2: Small-scale Significant substructure DBSCAN Detection I. NESTs detection in 2D star-forming regions
• Spatial Statistics in Star Forming Regions: Testing the Limits of Randomness
• A Code to Make Your Own Synthetic ObservaTIonS (MYOSOTIS)
• Spatial Statistics in Star Forming Regions: Is Star Formation Driven By Column Density Alone?
• The 800pc long tidal tails of the Hyades star cluster: Possible discovery of candidate epicyclic overdensities from an open star cluster
• Grouped star formation: converting sink particles to stars in hydrodynamical simulations

Cited by in corpus (3)

• The formation of clusters and OB associations in different density spiral arm environments
• Star cluster formation and feedback in different environments of a Milky Way-like galaxy
• S2D2: Small-scale Significant substructure DBSCAN Detection II. Tracing episodes and gradients of star formation activity