Should we doubt the cosmological constant?

Abstract

While Bayesian model selection is a useful tool to discriminate between competing cosmological models, it only gives a relative rather than an absolute measure of how good a model is. Bayesian doubt introduces an unknown benchmark model against which the known models are compared, thereby obtaining an absolute measure of model performance in a Bayesian framework. We apply this new methodology to the problem of the dark energy equation of state, comparing an absolute upper bound on the Bayesian evidence for a presently unknown dark energy model against a collection of known models including a flat LambdaCDM scenario. We find a strong absolute upper bound to the Bayes factor B between the unknown model and LambdaCDM, giving B < 3. The posterior probability for doubt is found to be less than 6% (with a 1% prior doubt) while the probability for LambdaCDM rises from an initial 25% to just over 50% in light of the data. We conclude that LambdaCDM remains a sufficient phenomenological description of currently available observations and that there is little statistical room for model improvement.

10 pages, 2 figures

References in corpus (28)

• Efficient Computation of CMB anisotropies in closed FRW models
• Cosmological parameters from CMB and other data: a Monte-Carlo approach
• MultiNest: an efficient and robust Bayesian inference tool for cosmology and particle physics
• Five-Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Likelihoods and Parameters from the WMAP data
• Multimodal nested sampling: an efficient and robust alternative to MCMC methods for astronomical data analysis
• Improved Cosmological Constraints from New, Old and Combined Supernova Datasets
• Cosmological Constraints from the SDSS Luminous Red Galaxies
• Bayes in the sky: Bayesian inference and model selection in cosmology
• First-year Sloan Digital Sky Survey-II (SDSS-II) Supernova Results: Hubble Diagram and Cosmological Parameters
• A high resolution foreground cleaned CMB map from WMAP
• The axis of evil
• Is the low-l microwave background cosmic?
• Prospects for probing the dark energy via supernova distance measurements
• A Parameterized Post-Friedmann Framework for Modified Gravity
• Applications of Bayesian model selection to cosmological parameters
• Large-angle anomalies in the CMB
• Crossing the Phantom Divide with Parameterized Post-Friedmann Dark Energy
• Limitations in using luminosity distance to determine the equation of state of the universe
• The impact of priors and observables on parameter inferences in the Constrained MSSM
• Measuring the effective complexity of cosmological models
• Challenges to the DGP Model from Horizon-Scale Growth and Geometry
• On model selection forecasting, Dark Energy and modified gravity
• Parametrized Post-Friedmann Signatures of Acceleration in the CMB
• Present and future evidence for evolving dark energy
• How flat can you get? A model comparison perspective on the curvature of the Universe
• Bayesian Calibrated Significance Levels Applied to the Spectral Tilt and Hemispherical Asymmetry
• Bayesian Evidence for a Cosmological Constant using new High-Redshift Supernovae Data
• MAMBO Observations at 240GHz of optically obscured Spitzer sources: source clumps and radio activity at high redshift

Cited by in corpus (14)

• Cosmology and Fundamental Physics with the Euclid Satellite
• Cosmology and fundamental physics with the Euclid satellite
• The Best Inflationary Models After Planck
• Is the Jeffreys' scale a reliable tool for Bayesian model comparison in cosmology?
• Inflation after Planck: Judgment Day
• Hunting Down the Best Model of Inflation with Bayesian Evidence
• Comparison between different methods of model selection in cosmology
• Applications of Bayesian model averaging to the curvature and size of the Universe
• Bayesian Methods in Cosmology
• Cosmology with Hypervelocity Stars
• Evidence for dark matter modulation in CoGeNT?
• Bayesian naturalness, simplicity, and testability applied to the $B-L$ MSSM GUT
• Bayesian model selection for dark energy using weak lensing forecasts
• Dark energy model selection with current and future data