Multiwavelength observations of 3C 454.3. I. The AGILE 2007 November campaign on the "Crazy Diamond"

Abstract

[Abridged] We report on a multiwavelength observation of the blazar 3C 454.3 (which we dubbed "crazy diamond") carried out on November 2007 by means of the astrophysical satellites AGILE, INTEGRAL, Swift, the WEBT Consortium, and the optical-NIR telescope REM. 3C 454.3 is detected at a $\sim 19-\sigma$ level during the 3-week observing period, with an average flux above 100 MeV of $F_{\mathrm{E}>100MeV}=(170\pm 13)\times 10^{-8}$ \phcmsec. The gamma-ray spectrum can be fit with a single power-law with photon index ${\Gamma }_{\mathrm{GRID}}=1.73\pm 0.16$ between 100 MeV and 1 GeV. We detect significant day-by-day variability of the gamma-ray emission during our observations, and we can exclude that the fluxes are constant at the 99.6% ($\sim 2.9\sigma$) level. The source was detected typically around 40 degrees off-axis, and it was substantially off--axis in the field of view of the AGILE hard X-ray imager. However, a 5-day long ToO observation by INTEGRAL detected 3C 454.3 at an average flux of about $F_{20-200keV}=1.49\times 10^{-3}$ \phcmsec with an average photon index of ${\Gamma }_{\mathrm{IBIS}}=1.75\pm 0.24$ between 20--200 keV. Swift also detected 3C 454.3 with a flux in the 0.3--10 keV energy band in the range $(1.23-1.40)\times 10^{-2}$ \phcmsec{} and a photon index in the range ${\Gamma }_{\mathrm{XRT}}=1.56-1.73$. In the optical band, both WEBT and REM show an extremely variable behavior in the $R$ band. A correlation analysis based on the entire data set is consistent with no time-lags between the gamma-ray and the optical flux variations. Our simultaneous multifrequency observations strongly indicate that the dominant emission mechanism between 30 MeV and 30 GeV is dominated by inverse Compton scattering of relativistic electrons in the jet on the external photons from the broad line region.

Accepted for publication in ApJ. Abridged Abstract. 37 pages, 14 Figures, 3 Tables

References in corpus (10)

• The power of blazar jets
• SuperAGILE: the hard X-ray Imager for the AGILE space mission
• The spectrum of the Broad Line Region and the high-energy emission of powerful blazars
• Swift and infra-red observations of the blazar 3C~454.3 during the giant X-ray flare of May 2005
• AGILE detection of a strong gamma-ray flare from the blazar 3C 454.3
• INTEGRAL observations of the blazar 3C454.3 in outburst
• The high activity of 3C 454.3 in autumn 2007. Monitoring by the WEBT during the AGILE detection
• On the July 2007 flare of the blazar 3C 454.3
• Does the Blazar Gamma-Ray Spectrum Harden with Increasing Flux? Analysis of 9 Years of EGRET Data
• Using GRO J1655-40 to test Swift/BAT as a monitor for bright hard X-ray sources

Cited by in corpus (15)

• Kinematics of Parsec-Scale Jets of Gamma-Ray Blazars at 43~GHz within the VLBA-BU-BLAZAR Program
• The Supernova Remnant W44: confirmations and challenges for cosmic-ray acceleration
• A peculiar multi-wavelength flare in the Blazar 3C 454.3
• Clues on High Energy Emission Mechanism from Blazar 3C 454.3 during 2015 August Flare
• Temporal correlation between the optical and γ-ray flux variations in the blazar 3C 454.3
• Multi-frequency variability study of Ton 599 during high activity of 2017
• Multi-wavelength Temporal Variability of the Blazar 3C 454.3 during 2014 Activity Phase
• MAGIC upper limits to the VHE gamma-ray flux of 3C454.3 in high emission state
• Time variability of the core-shift effect in the blazar 3C 454.3
• Spectral index-mass accretion rate correlation and evaluation of black hole masses in AGNs 3C~454.3 and M87
• On the Origin of Gamma-ray Flares from Bright Fermi Blazars
• Modeling the spectral-energy-distribution of 3C 454.3 in a "flat" broad-line-region scenario
• Revisiting radio variability of the blazar 3C 454.3
• Correlations between $\gamma$-ray luminosity and magnetization of the jet as well as relativistic electron injection power:cases for Mrk 421, 3C 454.3 and 3C 279
• The origin of Cosmic-Rays from SNRs: confirmations and challenges after the first direct proof