9.8k citations
Counting papers with at most 25 authors, so collaboration author lists do not stand in for the people here.
- Heidelberg UniversityDE146 papers
- German Cancer Research CenterDE68 papers
- National Center for Tumor DiseasesDE37 papers
- University Medical Center UtrechtNL18 papers
- Technical University of MunichDE15 papers
- Else Kröner Fresenius Center for Digital HealthDE14 papers
- Harvard UniversityUS14 papers
- University Hospital Carl Gustav CarusDE14 papers
- University Medical Centre MannheimDE14 papers
- RWTH Aachen UniversityDE13 papers
- Utrecht UniversityNL13 papers
- Karlsruhe Institute of TechnologyDE12 papers
5 papers · 1 filter
metamedian: An R package for meta-analyzing studies reporting medians
Sean McGrath, XiaoFei Zhao, Omer Ozturk +3
When performing an aggregate data meta-analysis of a continuous outcome, researchers often come across primary studies that report the sample median of the outcome. However, standa…
Perpetual Observational Studies: New strategies to support efficient implementation of observational studies and randomized trials in the infectious diseases arena
N. Hassoun-Kheir, C. H. van Werkhoven, J. Dunning +17
The increasing threat of emerging infectious diseases and antimicrobial resistance requires more efficient, high-quality research. Perpetual Observational Studies (POS) nested with…
Standard error estimation in meta-analysis of studies reporting medians
Sean McGrath, Stephan Katzenschlager, Alexandra J. Zimmer +3
We consider the setting of an aggregate data meta-analysis of a continuous outcome of interest. When the distribution of the outcome is skewed, it is often the case that some prima…
Measurement Error in Meta-Analysis (MEMA) -- a Bayesian framework for continuous outcome data
Harlan Campbell, Valentijn M. T. de Jong, Lauren Maxwell +3
Ideally, a meta-analysis will summarize data from several unbiased studies. Here we consider the less than ideal situation in which contributing studies may be compromised by measu…
Likelihood-based meta-analysis with few studies: Empirical and simulation studies
Svenja E. Seide, Christian Röver, Tim Friede
Standard random-effects meta-analysis methods perform poorly when applied to few studies only. Such settings however are commonly encountered in practice. It is unclear, whether or…