4 citations · 4 across the 2 of their papers we have counts for
5 papers
Black Hole Mass Determinations From Orbit Superposition Models are Reliable
Douglas Richstone, Karl Gebhardt, Monique Aller +13
We show that orbit-superposition dynamical models (Schwarzschild's method) provide reliable estimates of nuclear black hole masses and errors when constructed from adequate orbit l…
The WINGS Survey: a progress report
G. Fasano, B. Poggianti, D. Bettoni +7
A two-band (B and V) wide-field imaging survey of a complete, all-sky X-ray selected sample of 78 clusters in the redshift range z=0.04-0.07 is presented. The aim of this survey is…
Comparing the SBF Survey Velocity Field with the Gravity Field from Redshift Surveys
J. P. Blakeslee, M. Davis, J. L. Tonry +2
We compare the predicted local peculiar velocity field from the IRAS 1.2 Jy flux-limited redshift survey and the Optical Redshift Survey (ORS) to the measured peculiar velocities f…
The Supergalactic Plane revisited with the Optical Redshift Survey
O. Lahav, B. X. Santiago, A. M. Webster +4
We re-examine the existence and extent of the planar structure in the local galaxy density field, the so-called Supergalactic Plane (SGP). This structure is studied here in three d…
The Quadruple Gravitational Lens PG1115+080: Time Delays and Models
P. L. Schechter, C. D. Bailyn, R. Barr +24
Optical photometry is presented for the quadruple gravitational lens PG1115+080. A preliminary reduction of data taken from November 1995 to June 1996 gives component ``C'' leading…