activity
20092023
most citedRisk Agoras: Dialectical Argumentation for Scientific Reasoning

38 citations · 101 across the 12 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators
Showing cs.AIShow all

8 papers · 1 filter

cs.AI2021

Argument Schemes and Dialogue for Explainable Planning

Quratul-ain Mahesar, Simon Parsons

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is being increasingly deployed in practical applications. However, there is a major concern whether AI systems will be trusted by humans. In order to e…

cs.AI2017

On the links between argumentation-based reasoning and nonmonotonic reasoning

Zimi Li, Nir Oren, Simon Parsons

In this paper we investigate the links between instantiated argumentation systems and the axioms for non-monotonic reasoning described in [9] with the aim of characterising the nat…

cs.AI2013

On reasoning in networks with qualitative uncertainty

Simon Parsons, E. H. Mamdani

In this paper some initial work towards a new approach to qualitative reasoning under uncertainty is presented. This method is not only applicable to qualitative probabilistic reas…

cs.AI2013★ 27 cited

Refining Reasoning in Qualitative Probabilistic Networks

Simon Parsons

In recent years there has been a spate of papers describing systems for probabilisitic reasoning which do not use numerical probabilities. In some cases the simple set of values us…

cs.AI2013★ 12 cited

Pivotal Pruning of Trade-offs in QPNs

Silja Renooij, Linda C. van der Gaag, Simon Parsons +1

Qualitative probabilistic networks have been designed for probabilistic reasoning in a qualitative way. Due to their coarse level of representation detail, qualitative probabilisti…

cs.AI2013★ 38 cited

Risk Agoras: Dialectical Argumentation for Scientific Reasoning

Peter McBurney, Simon Parsons

We propose a formal framework for intelligent systems which can reason about scientific domains, in particular about the carcinogenicity of chemicals, and we study its properties.…