most citedLLMs Corrupt Your Documents When You Delegate

1 citations · 1 across the 8 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

10 papers

cs.CL2026

Towards User Simulators That Stay On Task And Still Sound Natural

Mustafa Omer Gul, Philippe Laban, Tanya Goyal +1

Users increasingly rely on AI systems for extended, multi-turn tasks, yet evidence indicates that LLM-based system performance degrades over prolonged interaction. To evaluate and…

cs.CL2026

Learning User Representations to Improve Simulation Fidelity

Shuhaib Mehri, Philippe Laban, Michel Galley +3

User simulators enable interactive training and evaluation of AI assistants at scale. Yet current simulators struggle to reproduce the diverse behaviors of real users, leading to a…

cs.AI2026

KnowSim: Evaluating Information Calibration in LLM Assistants with User Simulators that Learn

Yoonjoo Lee, Hyoungwook Jin, Tae Soo Kim +3

To effectively collaborate with users on knowledge-intensive tasks, Large Language Models (LLMs) must perform information calibration: matching content to a user's evolving underst…

cs.LG2026

LLMs Get Lost in Evolving User Intent

Jihoon Tack, Philippe Laban, Jennifer Neville

As LLMs become more capable, they are increasingly deployed as collaborative agents, taking on user-delegated tasks through iterative interaction. Yet genuine interaction is inhere…

cs.CL2026

Measuring and Mitigating the Distributional Gap Between Real and Simulated User Behaviors

Shuhaib Mehri, Philippe Laban, Sumuk Shashidhar +4

As user simulators are increasingly used for interactive training and evaluation of AI assistants, it is essential that they represent the diverse behaviors of real users. While ex…

cs.CL2026★ 1 cited

LLMs Corrupt Your Documents When You Delegate

Philippe Laban, Tobias Schnabel, Jennifer Neville

Large Language Models (LLMs) are poised to disrupt knowledge work, with the emergence of delegated work as a new interaction paradigm (e.g., vibe coding). Delegation requires trust…

cs.CL2026

ConvApparel: A Benchmark Dataset and Validation Framework for User Simulators in Conversational Recommenders

Ofer Meshi, Krisztian Balog, Sally Goldman +5

The promise of LLM-based user simulators to improve conversational AI is hindered by a critical "realism gap," leading to systems that are optimized for simulated interactions, but…

cs.CL2025

KRISTEVA: Close Reading as a Novel Task for Benchmarking Interpretive Reasoning

Peiqi Sui, Juan Diego Rodriguez, Philippe Laban +5

Each year, tens of millions of essays are written and graded in college-level English courses. Students are asked to analyze literary and cultural texts through a process known as…

cs.HC2025

Voice Interaction With Conversational AI Could Facilitate Thoughtful Reflection and Substantive Revision in Writing

Jiho Kim, Philippe Laban, Xiang 'Anthony' Chen +1

Writing well requires not only expressing ideas but also refining them through revision, a process facilitated by reflection. Prior research suggests that feedback delivered throug…

cs.CL2025

EvalAgent: Discovering Implicit Evaluation Criteria from the Web

Manya Wadhwa, Zayne Sprague, Chaitanya Malaviya +3

Evaluation of language model outputs on structured writing tasks is typically conducted with a number of desirable criteria presented to human evaluators or large language models (…