most citedHow long do top scientists maintain their stardom? An analysis by region, gender and discipline: evidence from Italy

26 citations · 80 across the 4 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators
Showing cs.DLShow all

4 papers · 1 filter

cs.DL2018★ 24 cited

The ratio of top scientists to the academic staff as an indicator of the competitive strength of universities

Giovanni Abramo, Ciriaco Andrea D'Angelo, Anastasiia Soldatenkova

The ability to attract and retain talented professors is a distinctive competence of world-class universities and a source of competitive advantage. The ratio of top scientists to…

cs.DL2018★ 8 cited

The dispersion of the citation distribution of top scientists' publications

Giovanni Abramo, Ciriaco Andrea D'Angelo, Anastasiia Soldatenkova

This work explores the distribution of citations for the publications of top scientists. A first objective is to find out whether the 80-20 Pareto rule applies, that is if 80% of t…

cs.DL2018★ 26 cited

How long do top scientists maintain their stardom? An analysis by region, gender and discipline: evidence from Italy

Giovanni Abramo, Ciriaco Andrea D'Angelo, Anastasiia Soldatenkova

We investigate the question of how long top scientists retain their stardom. We observe the research performance of all Italian professors in the sciences over three consecutive fo…

cs.DL2018★ 22 cited

An investigation on the skewness patterns and fractal nature of research productivity distributions at field and discipline level

Giovanni Abramo, Ciriaco Andrea D'Angelo, Anastasiia Soldatenkova

The paper provides an empirical examination of how research productivity distributions differ across scientific fields and disciplines. Productivity is measured using the FSS indic…