The ratio of top scientists to the academic staff as an indicator of the competitive strength of universities
arXiv:1810.12667 · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2016.04.013
Abstract
The ability to attract and retain talented professors is a distinctive competence of world-class universities and a source of competitive advantage. The ratio of top scientists to academic staff could therefore be an indicator of the competitive strength of the universities. This work identifies the Italian top scientists in over 200 fields, by their research productivity. It then ranks the relative universities by the ratio of top scientists to overall faculty. Finally, it contrasts this list with the ranking list by average productivity of the overall faculty. The analysis is carried out at the field, discipline, and overall university levels. The paper also explores the secondary question of whether the ratio of top scientists to faculty is related to the size of the university.
References in corpus (12)
- How do you define and measure research productivity?
- A heuristic approach to author name disambiguation in bibliometrics databases for large-scale research assessments
- The field-standardized average impact of national research systems compared to world average: the case of Italy
- The importance of accounting for the number of co-authors and their order when assessing research performance at the individual level in the life sciences
- Revisiting the scaling of citations for research assessment
- The impact of unproductive and top researchers on overall university research performance
- Career advancement and scientific performance in universities
- Revisiting size effects in higher education research productivity
- The dispersion of research performance within and between universities as a potential indicator of the competitive intensity in higher education systems
- Ranking research institutions by the number of highly-cited articles per scientist
- Variability of research performance across disciplines within universities in non-competitive higher education systems
- From rankings to funnel plots: the question of accounting for uncertainty when measuring university research performance