An investigation on the skewness patterns and fractal nature of research productivity distributions at field and discipline level
arXiv:1810.12624 · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2017.02.001
Abstract
The paper provides an empirical examination of how research productivity distributions differ across scientific fields and disciplines. Productivity is measured using the FSS indicator, which embeds both quantity and impact of output. The population studied consists of over 31,000 scientists in 180 fields (10 aggregate disciplines) of a national research system. The Characteristic Scores and Scale technique is used to investigate the distribution patterns for the different fields and disciplines. Research productivity distributions are found to be asymmetrical at the field level, although the degree of skewness varies substantially among the fields within the aggregate disciplines. We also examine whether the field productivity distributions show a fractal nature, which reveals an exception more than a rule. Differently, for the disciplines, the partitions of the distributions show skewed patterns that are highly similar.
References in corpus (5)
- How do you define and measure research productivity?
- A heuristic approach to author name disambiguation in bibliometrics databases for large-scale research assessments
- The importance of accounting for the number of co-authors and their order when assessing research performance at the individual level in the life sciences
- A farewell to the MNCS and like size-independent indicators
- Revisiting the scaling of citations for research assessment