activity
20192026
most citedExtracting Training Data from Large Language Models

273 citations · 1.1k across the 56 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators
Showing cs.LGShow all

21 papers · 1 filter

cs.LG2025★ 3 cited

The Attacker Moves Second: Stronger Adaptive Attacks Bypass Defenses Against Llm Jailbreaks and Prompt Injections

Milad Nasr, Nicholas Carlini, Chawin Sitawarin +11

How should we evaluate the robustness of language model defenses? Current defenses against jailbreaks and prompt injections (which aim to prevent an attacker from eliciting harmful…

cs.LG2025★ 1 cited

Position: Adversarial ML for LLMs Is Not Making Any Progress

Javier Rando, Jie Zhang, Nicholas Carlini +1

In the past decade, considerable research effort has been devoted to securing machine learning (ML) models that operate in adversarial settings. Yet, progress has been slow even fo…

cs.LG2025

Exploring and Mitigating Adversarial Manipulation of Voting-Based Leaderboards

Yangsibo Huang, Milad Nasr, Anastasios Angelopoulos +10

It is now common to evaluate Large Language Models (LLMs) by having humans manually vote to evaluate model outputs, in contrast to typical benchmarks that evaluate knowledge or ski…

cs.LG2024

Evaluating the Robustness of the "Ensemble Everything Everywhere" Defense

Jie Zhang, Christian Schlarmann, Kristina Nikolić +4

Ensemble everything everywhere is a defense to adversarial examples that was recently proposed to make image classifiers robust. This defense works by ensembling a model's intermed…

cs.LG2023★ 83 cited

Scalable Extraction of Training Data from (Production) Language Models

Milad Nasr, Nicholas Carlini, Jonathan Hayase +7

This paper studies extractable memorization: training data that an adversary can efficiently extract by querying a machine learning model without prior knowledge of the training da…

cs.LG2023★ 1 cited

Reverse-Engineering Decoding Strategies Given Blackbox Access to a Language Generation System

Daphne Ippolito, Nicholas Carlini, Katherine Lee +2

Neural language models are increasingly deployed into APIs and websites that allow a user to pass in a prompt and receive generated text. Many of these systems do not reveal genera…

cs.LG2023★ 3 cited

Randomness in ML Defenses Helps Persistent Attackers and Hinders Evaluators

Keane Lucas, Matthew Jagielski, Florian Tramèr +2

It is becoming increasingly imperative to design robust ML defenses. However, recent work has found that many defenses that initially resist state-of-the-art attacks can be broken…

cs.LG2022★ 9 cited

Position: Considerations for Differentially Private Learning with Large-Scale Public Pretraining

Florian Tramèr, Gautam Kamath, Nicholas Carlini

The performance of differentially private machine learning can be boosted significantly by leveraging the transfer learning capabilities of non-private models pretrained on large p…

cs.LG2022★ 20 cited

Preventing Verbatim Memorization in Language Models Gives a False Sense of Privacy

Daphne Ippolito, Florian Tramèr, Milad Nasr +5

Studying data memorization in neural language models helps us understand the risks (e.g., to privacy or copyright) associated with models regurgitating training data and aids in th…

cs.LG2022★ 4 cited

No Free Lunch in "Privacy for Free: How does Dataset Condensation Help Privacy"

Nicholas Carlini, Vitaly Feldman, Milad Nasr

New methods designed to preserve data privacy require careful scrutiny. Failure to preserve privacy is hard to detect, and yet can lead to catastrophic results when a system implem…

cs.LG2022★ 15 cited

Measuring Forgetting of Memorized Training Examples

Matthew Jagielski, Om Thakkar, Florian Tramèr +8

Machine learning models exhibit two seemingly contradictory phenomena: training data memorization, and various forms of forgetting. In memorization, models overfit specific trainin…

cs.LG2022★ 5 cited

Increasing Confidence in Adversarial Robustness Evaluations

Roland S. Zimmermann, Wieland Brendel, Florian Tramer +1

Hundreds of defenses have been proposed to make deep neural networks robust against minimal (adversarial) input perturbations. However, only a handful of these defenses held up the…

cs.LG2022★ 20 cited

The Privacy Onion Effect: Memorization is Relative

Nicholas Carlini, Matthew Jagielski, Chiyuan Zhang +3

Machine learning models trained on private datasets have been shown to leak their private data. While recent work has found that the average data point is rarely leaked, the outlie…

cs.LG2022★ 17 cited

(Certified!!) Adversarial Robustness for Free!

Nicholas Carlini, Florian Tramer, Krishnamurthy Dj Dvijotham +3

In this paper we show how to achieve state-of-the-art certified adversarial robustness to 2-norm bounded perturbations by relying exclusively on off-the-shelf pretrained models. To…

cs.LG2022★ 9 cited

Debugging Differential Privacy: A Case Study for Privacy Auditing

Florian Tramer, Andreas Terzis, Thomas Steinke +3

Differential Privacy can provide provable privacy guarantees for training data in machine learning. However, the presence of proofs does not preclude the presence of errors. Inspir…

cs.LG2022★ 166 cited

Quantifying Memorization Across Neural Language Models

Nicholas Carlini, Daphne Ippolito, Matthew Jagielski +3

Large language models (LMs) have been shown to memorize parts of their training data, and when prompted appropriately, they will emit the memorized training data verbatim. This is…

cs.LG2021★ 19 cited

Poisoning and Backdooring Contrastive Learning

Nicholas Carlini, Andreas Terzis

Multimodal contrastive learning methods like CLIP train on noisy and uncurated training datasets. This is cheaper than labeling datasets manually, and even improves out-of-distribu…

cs.LG2021★ 7 cited

Adversary Instantiation: Lower Bounds for Differentially Private Machine Learning

Milad Nasr, Shuang Song, Abhradeep Thakurta +2

Differentially private (DP) machine learning allows us to train models on private data while limiting data leakage. DP formalizes this data leakage through a cryptographic game, wh…

cs.LG2020★ 55 cited

Fundamental Tradeoffs between Invariance and Sensitivity to Adversarial Perturbations

Florian Tramèr, Jens Behrmann, Nicholas Carlini +2

Adversarial examples are malicious inputs crafted to induce misclassification. Commonly studied sensitivity-based adversarial examples introduce semantically-small changes to an in…

cs.LG2019★ 20 cited

MLSys: The New Frontier of Machine Learning Systems

Alexander Ratner, Dan Alistarh, Gustavo Alonso +66

Machine learning (ML) techniques are enjoying rapidly increasing adoption. However, designing and implementing the systems that support ML models in real-world deployments remains…

cs.LG2019★ 19 cited

Exploiting Excessive Invariance caused by Norm-Bounded Adversarial Robustness

Jörn-Henrik Jacobsen, Jens Behrmannn, Nicholas Carlini +2

Adversarial examples are malicious inputs crafted to cause a model to misclassify them. Their most common instantiation, "perturbation-based" adversarial examples introduce changes…