activity
20192026
most citedExtracting Training Data from Large Language Models

273 citations · 1.1k across the 56 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

58 papers

cs.AI2026

Automating ML for Science: Can Frontier Agents Climb Scientific Hills in the Wild?

Ming Zhong, Stacy Li, Nicholas Carlini +1

Frontier coding agents are increasingly framed as end-to-end automated researchers, and ML for science offers a demanding test of that promise: improving a scientific model often r…

cs.CR2026

CryptanalysisBench: Can LLMs do Cryptanalysis?

Lukas Fluri, Avital Shafran, Nicholas Carlini +5

Cryptanalysis - the task of finding attacks against cryptographic schemes - sits at the intersection of mathematical reasoning and cybersecurity, two areas where LLMs have advanced…

cs.CR2026

Large-scale online deanonymization with LLMs

Simon Lermen, Daniel Paleka, Joshua Swanson +3

We show that large language models can be used to perform at-scale deanonymization. With full Internet access, our agent can re-identify Hacker News users and Anthropic Interviewer…

cs.CR2025

SIRAJ: Diverse and Efficient Red-Teaming for LLM Agents via Distilled Structured Reasoning

Kaiwen Zhou, Ahmed Elgohary, A S M Iftekhar +1

The ability of LLM agents to plan and invoke tools exposes them to new safety risks, making a comprehensive red-teaming system crucial for discovering vulnerabilities and ensuring…

cs.CR2025

Detecting Adversarial Fine-tuning with Auditing Agents

Sarah Egler, John Schulman, Nicholas Carlini

Large Language Model (LLM) providers expose fine-tuning APIs that let end users fine-tune their frontier LLMs. Unfortunately, it has been shown that an adversary with fine-tuning a…

cs.LG2025★ 3 cited

The Attacker Moves Second: Stronger Adaptive Attacks Bypass Defenses Against Llm Jailbreaks and Prompt Injections

Milad Nasr, Nicholas Carlini, Chawin Sitawarin +11

How should we evaluate the robustness of language model defenses? Current defenses against jailbreaks and prompt injections (which aim to prevent an attacker from eliciting harmful…

cs.CR2025

Evaluating the Robustness of a Production Malware Detection System to Transferable Adversarial Attacks

Milad Nasr, Yanick Fratantonio, Luca Invernizzi +7

As deep learning models become widely deployed as components within larger production systems, their individual shortcomings can create system-level vulnerabilities with real-world…

cs.CR2025

LLMs unlock new paths to monetizing exploits

Nicholas Carlini, Milad Nasr, Edoardo Debenedetti +5

We argue that Large language models (LLMs) will soon alter the economics of cyberattacks. Instead of attacking the most commonly used software and monetizing exploits by targeting…

cs.AI2025

In-House Evaluation Is Not Enough: Towards Robust Third-Party Flaw Disclosure for General-Purpose AI

Shayne Longpre, Kevin Klyman, Ruth E. Appel +31

The widespread deployment of general-purpose AI (GPAI) systems introduces significant new risks. Yet the infrastructure, practices, and norms for reporting flaws in GPAI systems re…

cs.CR2025★ 1 cited

AutoAdvExBench: Benchmarking autonomous exploitation of adversarial example defenses

Nicholas Carlini, Javier Rando, Edoardo Debenedetti +2

We introduce AutoAdvExBench, a benchmark to evaluate if large language models (LLMs) can autonomously exploit defenses to adversarial examples. Unlike existing security benchmarks…

cs.CR2025★ 6 cited

Defeating Prompt Injections by Design

Edoardo Debenedetti, Ilia Shumailov, Tianqi Fan +7

Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in agentic systems that interact with an untrusted environment. However, LLM agents are vulnerable to prompt injection attack…

cs.LG2025★ 1 cited

Position: Adversarial ML for LLMs Is Not Making Any Progress

Javier Rando, Jie Zhang, Nicholas Carlini +1

In the past decade, considerable research effort has been devoted to securing machine learning (ML) models that operate in adversarial settings. Yet, progress has been slow even fo…

cs.LG2025

Exploring and Mitigating Adversarial Manipulation of Voting-Based Leaderboards

Yangsibo Huang, Milad Nasr, Anastasios Angelopoulos +10

It is now common to evaluate Large Language Models (LLMs) by having humans manually vote to evaluate model outputs, in contrast to typical benchmarks that evaluate knowledge or ski…

cs.CR2024

On Evaluating the Durability of Safeguards for Open-Weight LLMs

Xiangyu Qi, Boyi Wei, Nicholas Carlini +7

Stakeholders -- from model developers to policymakers -- seek to minimize the dual-use risks of large language models (LLMs). An open challenge to this goal is whether technical sa…

cs.CL2024

Measuring Non-Adversarial Reproduction of Training Data in Large Language Models

Michael Aerni, Javier Rando, Edoardo Debenedetti +3

Large language models memorize parts of their training data. Memorizing short snippets and facts is required to answer questions about the world and to be fluent in any language. B…

cs.CR2024★ 1 cited

SoK: Watermarking for AI-Generated Content

Xuandong Zhao, Sam Gunn, Miranda Christ +11

As the outputs of generative AI (GenAI) techniques improve in quality, it becomes increasingly challenging to distinguish them from human-created content. Watermarking schemes are…

cs.LG2024

Evaluating the Robustness of the "Ensemble Everything Everywhere" Defense

Jie Zhang, Christian Schlarmann, Kristina Nikolić +4

Ensemble everything everywhere is a defense to adversarial examples that was recently proposed to make image classifiers robust. This defense works by ensembling a model's intermed…

cs.CR2024★ 3 cited

Stealing User Prompts from Mixture of Experts

Itay Yona, Ilia Shumailov, Jamie Hayes +1

Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) models improve the efficiency and scalability of dense language models by routing each token to a small number of experts in each layer. In this paper, we…

cs.CR2024★ 1 cited

Remote Timing Attacks on Efficient Language Model Inference

Nicholas Carlini, Milad Nasr

Scaling up language models has significantly increased their capabilities. But larger models are slower models, and so there is now an extensive body of work (e.g., speculative sam…

cs.CR2024★ 1 cited

Persistent Pre-Training Poisoning of LLMs

Yiming Zhang, Javier Rando, Ivan Evtimov +5

Large language models are pre-trained on uncurated text datasets consisting of trillions of tokens scraped from the Web. Prior work has shown that: (1) web-scraped pre-training dat…

cs.CR2024★ 3 cited

Adversarial Perturbations Cannot Reliably Protect Artists From Generative AI

Robert Hönig, Javier Rando, Nicholas Carlini +1

Artists are increasingly concerned about advancements in image generation models that can closely replicate their unique artistic styles. In response, several protection tools agai…

cs.CL2024

Forcing Diffuse Distributions out of Language Models

Yiming Zhang, Avi Schwarzschild, Nicholas Carlini +2

Despite being trained specifically to follow user instructions, today's instructiontuned language models perform poorly when instructed to produce random outputs. For example, when…

cs.CR2024★ 7 cited

Stealing Part of a Production Language Model

Nicholas Carlini, Daniel Paleka, Krishnamurthy Dj Dvijotham +11

We introduce the first model-stealing attack that extracts precise, nontrivial information from black-box production language models like OpenAI's ChatGPT or Google's PaLM-2. Speci…

cs.CL2024

Query-Based Adversarial Prompt Generation

Jonathan Hayase, Ema Borevkovic, Nicholas Carlini +2

Recent work has shown it is possible to construct adversarial examples that cause an aligned language model to emit harmful strings or perform harmful behavior. Existing attacks wo…