activity
20202026
most citedToward Trustworthy AI Development: Mechanisms for Supporting Verifiable Claims

219 citations · 658 across the 34 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators
Showing 2024Show all

12 papers · 1 filter

cs.CY2024★ 3 cited

Safety cases for frontier AI

Marie Davidsen Buhl, Gaurav Sett, Leonie Koessler +2

As frontier artificial intelligence (AI) systems become more capable, it becomes more important that developers can explain why their systems are sufficiently safe. One way to do s…

cs.CY2024★ 1 cited

A Grading Rubric for AI Safety Frameworks

Jide Alaga, Jonas Schuett, Markus Anderljung

Over the past year, artificial intelligence (AI) companies have been increasingly adopting AI safety frameworks. These frameworks outline how companies intend to keep the potential…

cs.CY2024★ 7 cited

Open Problems in Technical AI Governance

Anka Reuel, Ben Bucknall, Stephen Casper +30

AI progress is creating a growing range of risks and opportunities, but it is often unclear how they should be navigated. In many cases, the barriers and uncertainties faced are at…

cs.CY2024★ 2 cited

From Principles to Rules: A Regulatory Approach for Frontier AI

Jonas Schuett, Markus Anderljung, Alexis Carlier +2

Several jurisdictions are starting to regulate frontier artificial intelligence (AI) systems, i.e. general-purpose AI systems that match or exceed the capabilities present in the m…

cs.CY2024★ 4 cited

Risk thresholds for frontier AI

Leonie Koessler, Jonas Schuett, Markus Anderljung

Frontier artificial intelligence (AI) systems could pose increasing risks to public safety and security. But what level of risk is acceptable? One increasingly popular approach is…

cs.AI2024

IDs for AI Systems

Alan Chan, Noam Kolt, Peter Wills +7

AI systems are increasingly pervasive, yet information needed to decide whether and how to engage with them may not exist or be accessible. A user may not be able to verify whether…

cs.CY2024★ 2 cited

Towards interactive evaluations for interaction harms in human-AI systems

Lujain Ibrahim, Saffron Huang, Umang Bhatt +2

Current AI evaluation methods, which rely on static, model-only tests, fail to account for harms that emerge through sustained human-AI interaction. As AI systems proliferate and a…

cs.CY2024★ 3 cited

Societal Adaptation to Advanced AI

Jamie Bernardi, Gabriel Mukobi, Hilary Greaves +2

Existing strategies for managing risks from advanced AI systems often focus on affecting what AI systems are developed and how they diffuse. However, this approach becomes less fea…

cs.CY2024

Responsible Reporting for Frontier AI Development

Noam Kolt, Markus Anderljung, Joslyn Barnhart +7

Mitigating the risks from frontier AI systems requires up-to-date and reliable information about those systems. Organizations that develop and deploy frontier systems have signific…

cs.LG2024★ 16 cited

Foundational Challenges in Assuring Alignment and Safety of Large Language Models

Usman Anwar, Abulhair Saparov, Javier Rando +39

This work identifies 18 foundational challenges in assuring the alignment and safety of large language models (LLMs). These challenges are organized into three different categories…

cs.CY2024★ 22 cited

Computing Power and the Governance of Artificial Intelligence

Girish Sastry, Lennart Heim, Haydn Belfield +16

Computing power, or "compute," is crucial for the development and deployment of artificial intelligence (AI) capabilities. As a result, governments and companies have started to le…

cs.CY2024★ 1 cited

Visibility into AI Agents

Alan Chan, Carson Ezell, Max Kaufmann +9

Increased delegation of commercial, scientific, governmental, and personal activities to AI agents -- systems capable of pursuing complex goals with limited supervision -- may exac…