219 citations · 658 across the 34 of their papers we have counts for
6 papers · 1 filter
Towards Publicly Accountable Frontier LLMs: Building an External Scrutiny Ecosystem under the ASPIRE Framework
Markus Anderljung, Everett Thornton Smith, Joe O'Brien +7
With the increasing integration of frontier large language models (LLMs) into society and the economy, decisions related to their training, deployment, and use have far-reaching im…
Open-Sourcing Highly Capable Foundation Models: An evaluation of risks, benefits, and alternative methods for pursuing open-source objectives
Elizabeth Seger, Noemi Dreksler, Richard Moulange +19
Recent decisions by leading AI labs to either open-source their models or to restrict access to their models has sparked debate about whether, and how, increasingly capable AI mode…
Frontier AI Regulation: Managing Emerging Risks to Public Safety
Markus Anderljung, Joslyn Barnhart, Anton Korinek +21
Advanced AI models hold the promise of tremendous benefits for humanity, but society needs to proactively manage the accompanying risks. In this paper, we focus on what we term "fr…
Towards best practices in AGI safety and governance: A survey of expert opinion
Jonas Schuett, Noemi Dreksler, Markus Anderljung +4
A number of leading AI companies, including OpenAI, Google DeepMind, and Anthropic, have the stated goal of building artificial general intelligence (AGI) - AI systems that achieve…
Model evaluation for extreme risks
Toby Shevlane, Sebastian Farquhar, Ben Garfinkel +18
Current approaches to building general-purpose AI systems tend to produce systems with both beneficial and harmful capabilities. Further progress in AI development could lead to ca…
Protecting Society from AI Misuse: When are Restrictions on Capabilities Warranted?
Markus Anderljung, Julian Hazell
Artificial intelligence (AI) systems will increasingly be used to cause harm as they grow more capable. In fact, AI systems are already starting to be used to automate fraudulent a…