23 citations · 64 across the 6 of their papers we have counts for
6 papers
Discussion Tracker: Supporting Teacher Learning about Students' Collaborative Argumentation in High School Classrooms
Luca Lugini, Christopher Olshefski, Ravneet Singh +2
Teaching collaborative argumentation is an advanced skill that many K-12 teachers struggle to develop. To address this, we have developed Discussion Tracker, a classroom discussion…
Contextual Argument Component Classification for Class Discussions
Luca Lugini, Diane Litman
Argument mining systems often consider contextual information, i.e. information outside of an argumentative discourse unit, when trained to accomplish tasks such as argument compon…
The Discussion Tracker Corpus of Collaborative Argumentation
Christopher Olshefski, Luca Lugini, Ravneet Singh +2
Although Natural Language Processing (NLP) research on argument mining has advanced considerably in recent years, most studies draw on corpora of asynchronous and written texts, of…
Annotating Student Talk in Text-based Classroom Discussions
Luca Lugini, Diane Litman, Amanda Godley +1
Classroom discussions in English Language Arts have a positive effect on students' reading, writing and reasoning skills. Although prior work has largely focused on teacher talk an…
Argument Component Classification for Classroom Discussions
Luca Lugini, Diane Litman
This paper focuses on argument component classification for transcribed spoken classroom discussions, with the goal of automatically classifying student utterances into claims, evi…
Predicting Specificity in Classroom Discussion
Luca Lugini, Diane Litman
High quality classroom discussion is important to student development, enhancing abilities to express claims, reason about other students' claims, and retain information for longer…