29 citations · 55 across the 5 of their papers we have counts for
5 papers
ArgRewrite V.2: an Annotated Argumentative Revisions Corpus
Omid Kashefi, Tazin Afrin, Meghan Dale +4
Analyzing how humans revise their writings is an interesting research question, not only from an educational perspective but also in terms of artificial intelligence. Better unders…
Effective Interfaces for Student-Driven Revision Sessions for Argumentative Writing
Tazin Afrin, Omid Kashefi, Christopher Olshefski +3
We present the design and evaluation of a web-based intelligent writing assistant that helps students recognize their revisions of argumentative essays. To understand how our revis…
Discussion Tracker: Supporting Teacher Learning about Students' Collaborative Argumentation in High School Classrooms
Luca Lugini, Christopher Olshefski, Ravneet Singh +2
Teaching collaborative argumentation is an advanced skill that many K-12 teachers struggle to develop. To address this, we have developed Discussion Tracker, a classroom discussion…
The Discussion Tracker Corpus of Collaborative Argumentation
Christopher Olshefski, Luca Lugini, Ravneet Singh +2
Although Natural Language Processing (NLP) research on argument mining has advanced considerably in recent years, most studies draw on corpora of asynchronous and written texts, of…
Annotating Student Talk in Text-based Classroom Discussions
Luca Lugini, Diane Litman, Amanda Godley +1
Classroom discussions in English Language Arts have a positive effect on students' reading, writing and reasoning skills. Although prior work has largely focused on teacher talk an…