paper

Effective Interfaces for Student-Driven Revision Sessions for Argumentative Writing

arXiv:2107.07018 · doi:10.1145/3411764.3445683

Abstract

We present the design and evaluation of a web-based intelligent writing assistant that helps students recognize their revisions of argumentative essays. To understand how our revision assistant can best support students, we have implemented four versions of our system with differences in the unit span (sentence versus sub-sentence) of revision analysis and the level of feedback provided (none, binary, or detailed revision purpose categorization). We first discuss the design decisions behind relevant components of the system, then analyze the efficacy of the different versions through a Wizard of Oz study with university students. Our results show that while a simple interface with no revision feedback is easier to use, an interface that provides a detailed categorization of sentence-level revisions is the most helpful based on user survey data, as well as the most effective based on improvement in writing outcomes.

arXiv comment13 pages, The 2021 ACM CHI Virtual Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

References in corpus (1)

Cited by in corpus (6)