218 citations · 1k across the 50 of their papers we have counts for
11 papers · 1 filter
A Theory of Bounded Inductive Rationality
Caspar Oesterheld, Abram Demski, Vincent Conitzer
The dominant theories of rational choice assume logical omniscience. That is, they assume that when facing a decision problem, an agent can perform all relevant computations and de…
Tradeoffs in Preventing Manipulation in Paper Bidding for Reviewer Assignment
Steven Jecmen, Nihar B. Shah, Fei Fang +1
Many conferences rely on paper bidding as a key component of their reviewer assignment procedure. These bids are then taken into account when assigning reviewers to help ensure tha…
Near-Optimal Reviewer Splitting in Two-Phase Paper Reviewing and Conference Experiment Design
Steven Jecmen, Hanrui Zhang, Ryan Liu +3
Many scientific conferences employ a two-phase paper review process, where some papers are assigned additional reviewers after the initial reviews are submitted. Many conferences a…
Ethical Implementation of Artificial Intelligence to Select Embryos in In Vitro Fertilization
Michael Anis Mihdi Afnan, Cynthia Rudin, Vincent Conitzer +4
AI has the potential to revolutionize many areas of healthcare. Radiology, dermatology, and ophthalmology are some of the areas most likely to be impacted in the near future, and t…
Indecision Modeling
Duncan C McElfresh, Lok Chan, Kenzie Doyle +4
AI systems are often used to make or contribute to important decisions in a growing range of applications, including criminal justice, hiring, and medicine. Since these decisions i…
Mitigating Manipulation in Peer Review via Randomized Reviewer Assignments
Steven Jecmen, Hanrui Zhang, Ryan Liu +3
We consider three important challenges in conference peer review: (i) reviewers maliciously attempting to get assigned to certain papers to provide positive reviews, possibly as pa…