activity
20122026
most citedMitigating Bias in Algorithmic Hiring: Evaluating Claims and Practices

799 citations · 2.4k across the 46 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

49 papers

cs.HC2026

What We Know about Responsible AI Practices in Industry: A Half Decade of Empirical Research

Wesley Hanwen Deng, Agathe Balayn, Andrew Selbst +6

Responsible AI (RAI) has become a central concern for technology companies, regulators, and the public. How industry practitioners interpret, implement, and sustain RAI work direct…

cs.CY2026

Beyond "I Can't Help With That": How Child Safety Experts Evaluate AI Chatbot Safety

Hannah Cha, Neha Shukla, Solon Barocas +3

Youth increasingly turn to AI chatbots for social and emotional support, raising concerns about how these systems respond, especially in high-stakes situations. However, existing c…

cs.CY2026

The Fair Lending Model: How the Longest-Running Algorithmic Fairness Programs Work in Practice

Emily Black, Miranda Bogen, Logan Koepke +3

U.S. financial institutions subject to fair lending laws have been running algorithmic fairness programs for decades. Despite this long history, remarkably little is known about ho…

cs.CL2026

AI-Assisted Systematization for Evaluating GenAI Systems

Dhruv Agarwal, Emily Sheng, Chad Atalla +6

Evaluating generative AI (GenAI) systems is challenging because many targets of evaluation are broad, contested concepts, such as "reasoning," "fairness," or "creativity." When the…

cs.CY2026

Effects of Generative AI Errors on User Reliance Across Task Difficulty

Jacy Reese Anthis, Hannah Cha, Solon Barocas +2

The capabilities of artificial intelligence (AI) lie along a jagged frontier, where AI systems surprisingly fail on tasks that humans find easy and succeed on tasks that humans fin…

cs.LG2026

Comparison requires valid measurement: Rethinking attack success rate comparisons in AI red teaming

Alexandra Chouldechova, A. Feder Cooper, Solon Barocas +3

We argue that conclusions drawn about relative system safety or attack method efficacy via AI red teaming are often not supported by evidence provided by attack success rate (ASR)…

cs.CY2025

Statistical Guarantees in the Search for Less Discriminatory Algorithms

Chris Hays, Ben Laufer, Solon Barocas +1

U.S. discrimination law can impose liability on firms that fail to adopt a less discriminatory alternative (LDA): a decision policy that achieves the same business objectives while…

cs.LG2025

Bridging Prediction and Intervention Problems in Social Systems

Lydia T. Liu, Inioluwa Deborah Raji, Angela Zhou +32

Many automated decision systems (ADS) are designed to solve prediction problems -- where the goal is to learn patterns from a sample of the population and apply them to individuals…

cs.GT2025

Designing Algorithmic Delegates: The Role of Indistinguishability in Human-AI Handoff

Sophie Greenwood, Karen Levy, Solon Barocas +2

As AI technologies improve, people are increasingly willing to delegate tasks to AI agents. In many cases, the human decision-maker chooses whether to delegate to an AI agent based…

cs.CY2025

Distinguishing Task-Specific and General-Purpose AI in Regulation

Jennifer Wang, Andrew Selbst, Solon Barocas +1

Over the past decade, policymakers have developed a set of regulatory tools to ensure AI development aligns with key societal goals. Many of these tools were initially developed in…

cs.CY2025

Rigor in AI: Doing Rigorous AI Work Requires a Broader, Responsible AI-Informed Conception of Rigor

Alexandra Olteanu, Su Lin Blodgett, Agathe Balayn +7

In AI research and practice, rigor remains largely understood in terms of methodological rigor -- such as whether mathematical, statistical, or computational methods are correctly…

cs.CY2025

AI Automatons: AI Systems Intended to Imitate Humans

Alexandra Olteanu, Solon Barocas, Su Lin Blodgett +3

There is a growing proliferation of AI systems designed to mimic people's behavior, work, abilities, likenesses, or humanness -- systems we dub AI automatons. Individuals, groups,…

cs.LG2025★ 2 cited

Validating LLM-as-a-Judge Systems under Rating Indeterminacy

Luke Guerdan, Solon Barocas, Kenneth Holstein +3

The LLM-as-a-judge paradigm, in which a judge LLM system replaces human raters in rating the outputs of other generative AI (GenAI) systems, plays a critical role in scaling and st…

cs.CY2025★ 1 cited

Position: Evaluating Generative AI Systems Is a Social Science Measurement Challenge

Hanna Wallach, Meera Desai, A. Feder Cooper +17

The measurement tasks involved in evaluating generative AI (GenAI) systems lack sufficient scientific rigor, leading to what has been described as "a tangle of sloppy tests [and] a…

cs.HC2025★ 6 cited

Understanding the LLM-ification of CHI: Unpacking the Impact of LLMs at CHI through a Systematic Literature Review

Rock Yuren Pang, Hope Schroeder, Kynnedy Simone Smith +4

Large language models (LLMs) have been positioned to revolutionize HCI, by reshaping not only the interfaces, design patterns, and sociotechnical systems that we study, but also th…

cs.CY2024

A Shared Standard for Valid Measurement of Generative AI Systems' Capabilities, Risks, and Impacts

Alexandra Chouldechova, Chad Atalla, Solon Barocas +11

The valid measurement of generative AI (GenAI) systems' capabilities, risks, and impacts forms the bedrock of our ability to evaluate these systems. We introduce a shared standard…

cs.CY2024★ 4 cited

What Constitutes a Less Discriminatory Algorithm?

Benjamin Laufer, Manish Raghavan, Solon Barocas

Disparate impact doctrine offers an important legal apparatus for targeting discriminatory data-driven algorithmic decisions. A recent body of work has focused on conceptualizing o…

cs.LG2024★ 2 cited

Machine Unlearning Doesn't Do What You Think: Lessons for Generative AI Policy and Research

A. Feder Cooper, Christopher A. Choquette-Choo, Miranda Bogen +34

"Machine unlearning" is a popular proposed solution for mitigating the existence of content in an AI model that is problematic for legal or moral reasons, including privacy, copyri…

cs.LG2024

A Framework for Evaluating LLMs Under Task Indeterminacy

Luke Guerdan, Hanna Wallach, Solon Barocas +1

Large language model (LLM) evaluations often assume there is a single correct response -- a gold label -- for each item in the evaluation corpus. However, some tasks can be ambiguo…

cs.CY2024★ 2 cited

Dimensions of Generative AI Evaluation Design

P. Alex Dow, Jennifer Wortman Vaughan, Solon Barocas +3

There are few principles or guidelines to ensure evaluations of generative AI (GenAI) models and systems are effective. To help address this gap, we propose a set of general dimens…

cs.CY2024★ 2 cited

Evaluating Generative AI Systems is a Social Science Measurement Challenge

Hanna Wallach, Meera Desai, Nicholas Pangakis +17

Across academia, industry, and government, there is an increasing awareness that the measurement tasks involved in evaluating generative AI (GenAI) systems are especially difficult…

cs.HC2024★ 8 cited

Supporting Industry Computing Researchers in Assessing, Articulating, and Addressing the Potential Negative Societal Impact of Their Work

Wesley Hanwen Deng, Solon Barocas, Jennifer Wortman Vaughan

Recent years have witnessed increasing calls for computing researchers to grapple with the societal impacts of their work. Tools such as impact assessments have gained prominence a…

cs.CL2024

PERSONA: A Reproducible Testbed for Pluralistic Alignment

Louis Castricato, Nathan Lile, Rafael Rafailov +2

The rapid advancement of language models (LMs) necessitates robust alignment with diverse user values. However, current preference optimization approaches often fail to capture the…

cs.CY2024

The Legal Duty to Search for Less Discriminatory Algorithms

Emily Black, Logan Koepke, Pauline Kim +2

Work in computer science has established that, contrary to conventional wisdom, for a given prediction problem there are almost always multiple possible models with equivalent perf…