activity
20122026
most citedMitigating Bias in Algorithmic Hiring: Evaluating Claims and Practices

799 citations · 2.4k across the 46 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators
Showing cs.CYShow all

28 papers · 1 filter

cs.CY2026

Beyond "I Can't Help With That": How Child Safety Experts Evaluate AI Chatbot Safety

Hannah Cha, Neha Shukla, Solon Barocas +3

Youth increasingly turn to AI chatbots for social and emotional support, raising concerns about how these systems respond, especially in high-stakes situations. However, existing c…

cs.CY2026

The Fair Lending Model: How the Longest-Running Algorithmic Fairness Programs Work in Practice

Emily Black, Miranda Bogen, Logan Koepke +3

U.S. financial institutions subject to fair lending laws have been running algorithmic fairness programs for decades. Despite this long history, remarkably little is known about ho…

cs.CY2026

Effects of Generative AI Errors on User Reliance Across Task Difficulty

Jacy Reese Anthis, Hannah Cha, Solon Barocas +2

The capabilities of artificial intelligence (AI) lie along a jagged frontier, where AI systems surprisingly fail on tasks that humans find easy and succeed on tasks that humans fin…

cs.CY2025

Statistical Guarantees in the Search for Less Discriminatory Algorithms

Chris Hays, Ben Laufer, Solon Barocas +1

U.S. discrimination law can impose liability on firms that fail to adopt a less discriminatory alternative (LDA): a decision policy that achieves the same business objectives while…

cs.CY2025

Distinguishing Task-Specific and General-Purpose AI in Regulation

Jennifer Wang, Andrew Selbst, Solon Barocas +1

Over the past decade, policymakers have developed a set of regulatory tools to ensure AI development aligns with key societal goals. Many of these tools were initially developed in…

cs.CY2025

Rigor in AI: Doing Rigorous AI Work Requires a Broader, Responsible AI-Informed Conception of Rigor

Alexandra Olteanu, Su Lin Blodgett, Agathe Balayn +7

In AI research and practice, rigor remains largely understood in terms of methodological rigor -- such as whether mathematical, statistical, or computational methods are correctly…

cs.CY2025

AI Automatons: AI Systems Intended to Imitate Humans

Alexandra Olteanu, Solon Barocas, Su Lin Blodgett +3

There is a growing proliferation of AI systems designed to mimic people's behavior, work, abilities, likenesses, or humanness -- systems we dub AI automatons. Individuals, groups,…

cs.CY2025★ 1 cited

Position: Evaluating Generative AI Systems Is a Social Science Measurement Challenge

Hanna Wallach, Meera Desai, A. Feder Cooper +17

The measurement tasks involved in evaluating generative AI (GenAI) systems lack sufficient scientific rigor, leading to what has been described as "a tangle of sloppy tests [and] a…

cs.CY2024

A Shared Standard for Valid Measurement of Generative AI Systems' Capabilities, Risks, and Impacts

Alexandra Chouldechova, Chad Atalla, Solon Barocas +11

The valid measurement of generative AI (GenAI) systems' capabilities, risks, and impacts forms the bedrock of our ability to evaluate these systems. We introduce a shared standard…

cs.CY2024★ 4 cited

What Constitutes a Less Discriminatory Algorithm?

Benjamin Laufer, Manish Raghavan, Solon Barocas

Disparate impact doctrine offers an important legal apparatus for targeting discriminatory data-driven algorithmic decisions. A recent body of work has focused on conceptualizing o…

cs.CY2024★ 2 cited

Dimensions of Generative AI Evaluation Design

P. Alex Dow, Jennifer Wortman Vaughan, Solon Barocas +3

There are few principles or guidelines to ensure evaluations of generative AI (GenAI) models and systems are effective. To help address this gap, we propose a set of general dimens…

cs.CY2024★ 2 cited

Evaluating Generative AI Systems is a Social Science Measurement Challenge

Hanna Wallach, Meera Desai, Nicholas Pangakis +17

Across academia, industry, and government, there is an increasing awareness that the measurement tasks involved in evaluating generative AI (GenAI) systems are especially difficult…

cs.CY2024

The Legal Duty to Search for Less Discriminatory Algorithms

Emily Black, Logan Koepke, Pauline Kim +2

Work in computer science has established that, contrary to conventional wisdom, for a given prediction problem there are almost always multiple possible models with equivalent perf…

cs.CY2024★ 1 cited

Measuring Machine Learning Harms from Stereotypes Requires Understanding Who Is Harmed by Which Errors in What Ways

Angelina Wang, Xuechunzi Bai, Solon Barocas +1

As machine learning applications proliferate, we need an understanding of their potential for harm. However, current fairness metrics are rarely grounded in human psychological exp…

cs.CY2023★ 3 cited

Taxonomizing and Measuring Representational Harms: A Look at Image Tagging

Jared Katzman, Angelina Wang, Morgan Scheuerman +4

In this paper, we examine computational approaches for measuring the "fairness" of image tagging systems, finding that they cluster into five distinct categories, each with its own…

cs.CY2022★ 1 cited

Measuring Representational Harms in Image Captioning

Angelina Wang, Solon Barocas, Kristen Laird +1

Previous work has largely considered the fairness of image captioning systems through the underspecified lens of "bias." In contrast, we present a set of techniques for measuring f…

cs.CY2022★ 38 cited

An Uncommon Task: Participatory Design in Legal AI

Fernando Delgado, Solon Barocas, Karen Levy

Despite growing calls for participation in AI design, there are to date few empirical studies of what these processes look like and how they can be structured for meaningful engage…

cs.CY2021★ 48 cited

Algorithmic Auditing and Social Justice: Lessons from the History of Audit Studies

Briana Vecchione, Solon Barocas, Karen Levy

Algorithmic audits have been embraced as tools to investigate the functioning and consequences of sociotechnical systems. Though the term is used somewhat loosely in the algorithmi…

cs.CY2021★ 35 cited

Computer Vision and Conflicting Values: Describing People with Automated Alt Text

Margot Hanley, Solon Barocas, Karen Levy +2

Scholars have recently drawn attention to a range of controversial issues posed by the use of computer vision for automatically generating descriptions of people in images. Despite…

cs.CY2021

On Modeling Human Perceptions of Allocation Policies with Uncertain Outcomes

Hoda Heidari, Solon Barocas, Jon Kleinberg +1

Many policies allocate harms or benefits that are uncertain in nature: they produce distributions over the population in which individuals have different probabilities of incurring…

cs.CY2021★ 2 cited

Designing Disaggregated Evaluations of AI Systems: Choices, Considerations, and Tradeoffs

Solon Barocas, Anhong Guo, Ece Kamar +5

Disaggregated evaluations of AI systems, in which system performance is assessed and reported separately for different groups of people, are conceptually simple. However, their des…

cs.CY2019★ 217 cited

The Hidden Assumptions Behind Counterfactual Explanations and Principal Reasons

Solon Barocas, Andrew D. Selbst, Manish Raghavan

Counterfactual explanations are gaining prominence within technical, legal, and business circles as a way to explain the decisions of a machine learning model. These explanations s…

cs.CY2019★ 220 cited

Roles for Computing in Social Change

Rediet Abebe, Solon Barocas, Jon Kleinberg +3

A recent normative turn in computer science has brought concerns about fairness, bias, and accountability to the core of the field. Yet recent scholarship has warned that much of t…

cs.CY2019★ 799 cited

Mitigating Bias in Algorithmic Hiring: Evaluating Claims and Practices

Manish Raghavan, Solon Barocas, Jon Kleinberg +1

There has been rapidly growing interest in the use of algorithms in hiring, especially as a means to address or mitigate bias. Yet, to date, little is known about how these methods…