activity
20122026
most citedMitigating Bias in Algorithmic Hiring: Evaluating Claims and Practices

799 citations · 2.4k across the 46 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators
Showing 2024Show all

11 papers · 1 filter

cs.CY2024

A Shared Standard for Valid Measurement of Generative AI Systems' Capabilities, Risks, and Impacts

Alexandra Chouldechova, Chad Atalla, Solon Barocas +11

The valid measurement of generative AI (GenAI) systems' capabilities, risks, and impacts forms the bedrock of our ability to evaluate these systems. We introduce a shared standard…

cs.CY2024★ 4 cited

What Constitutes a Less Discriminatory Algorithm?

Benjamin Laufer, Manish Raghavan, Solon Barocas

Disparate impact doctrine offers an important legal apparatus for targeting discriminatory data-driven algorithmic decisions. A recent body of work has focused on conceptualizing o…

cs.LG2024★ 2 cited

Machine Unlearning Doesn't Do What You Think: Lessons for Generative AI Policy and Research

A. Feder Cooper, Christopher A. Choquette-Choo, Miranda Bogen +34

"Machine unlearning" is a popular proposed solution for mitigating the existence of content in an AI model that is problematic for legal or moral reasons, including privacy, copyri…

cs.LG2024

A Framework for Evaluating LLMs Under Task Indeterminacy

Luke Guerdan, Hanna Wallach, Solon Barocas +1

Large language model (LLM) evaluations often assume there is a single correct response -- a gold label -- for each item in the evaluation corpus. However, some tasks can be ambiguo…

cs.CY2024★ 2 cited

Dimensions of Generative AI Evaluation Design

P. Alex Dow, Jennifer Wortman Vaughan, Solon Barocas +3

There are few principles or guidelines to ensure evaluations of generative AI (GenAI) models and systems are effective. To help address this gap, we propose a set of general dimens…

cs.CY2024★ 2 cited

Evaluating Generative AI Systems is a Social Science Measurement Challenge

Hanna Wallach, Meera Desai, Nicholas Pangakis +17

Across academia, industry, and government, there is an increasing awareness that the measurement tasks involved in evaluating generative AI (GenAI) systems are especially difficult…

cs.HC2024★ 8 cited

Supporting Industry Computing Researchers in Assessing, Articulating, and Addressing the Potential Negative Societal Impact of Their Work

Wesley Hanwen Deng, Solon Barocas, Jennifer Wortman Vaughan

Recent years have witnessed increasing calls for computing researchers to grapple with the societal impacts of their work. Tools such as impact assessments have gained prominence a…

cs.CL2024

PERSONA: A Reproducible Testbed for Pluralistic Alignment

Louis Castricato, Nathan Lile, Rafael Rafailov +2

The rapid advancement of language models (LMs) necessitates robust alignment with diverse user values. However, current preference optimization approaches often fail to capture the…

cs.CY2024

The Legal Duty to Search for Less Discriminatory Algorithms

Emily Black, Logan Koepke, Pauline Kim +2

Work in computer science has established that, contrary to conventional wisdom, for a given prediction problem there are almost always multiple possible models with equivalent perf…

cs.CL2024

What is Your Favorite Gender, MLM? Gender Bias Evaluation in Multilingual Masked Language Models

Jeongrok Yu, Seong Ug Kim, Jacob Choi +1

Bias is a disproportionate prejudice in favor of one side against another. Due to the success of transformer-based Masked Language Models (MLMs) and their impact on many NLP tasks,…

cs.CY2024★ 1 cited

Measuring Machine Learning Harms from Stereotypes Requires Understanding Who Is Harmed by Which Errors in What Ways

Angelina Wang, Xuechunzi Bai, Solon Barocas +1

As machine learning applications proliferate, we need an understanding of their potential for harm. However, current fairness metrics are rarely grounded in human psychological exp…