Reply to Comments of Bassi, Ghirardi, and Tumulka on the Free Will Theorem

Abstract

We show that the authors in the title have erred in claiming that our axiom FIN is false by conflating it with Bell locality. We also argue that the predictions of quantum mechanics, and in particular EPR, are fully Lorentz invariant, whereas the Free Will Theorem shows that theories with a mechanism of reduction, such as GRW, cannot be made fully invariant.

arXiv commentWe sharpen our theorem by replacing axiom FIN by a weaker axiom MIN to answer the above authors' objections

References in corpus (3)

• The Free Will Theorem
• The Conway-Kochen argument and relativistic GRW models
• Comment on "The Free Will Theorem"

Cited by in corpus (7)

• The Point Processes of the GRW Theory of Wave Function Collapse
• What Does the Free Will Theorem Actually Prove?
• Dynamical state reduction in an EPR experiment
• Lorentz-invariant, retrocausal, and deterministic hidden variables
• Schrödinger's paradox and proofs of nonlocality using only perfect correlations
• Quantum Mechanics and Nonlocality: In Search of Instructive Description
• Relativistic Model for Gravity-Induced Quantum State Reduction