Bell's inequalities II: logical loophole in their interpretation
arXiv:quant-ph/0101094 · doi:10.1016/S0030-4018(99)00418-6
Abstract
Assumed data streams from a delayed choice gedanken experiment must satisfy a Bell's identity independently of locality assumptions. The violation of Bell's inequality by assumed correlations of identical form among these data streams implies that they cannot all result from statistically equivalent variables of a homogeneous process. This is consistent with both the requirements of arithmetic and distinctions between commuting and noncommuting observables in quantum mechanics. Neglect of these distinctions implies a logical loophole in the conventional interpretation of Bell's inequalities.
17 pages, 2 figures
References in corpus (1)
Cited by in corpus (5)
- Bell's inequalities I: An explanation for their experimental violation
- Correlations for a new Bell's inequality experiment
- Bell's Theory with no Locality assumption: putting Free Will at work
- Bell's inequality violation due to misidentification of spatially non stationary random processes
- Logical difficulty from combining counterfactuals in the GHZ-Bell theorems