Bell's inequalities I: An explanation for their experimental violation

Abstract

Derivations of two Bell's inequalities are given in a form appropriate to the interpretation of experimental data for explicit determination of all the correlations. They are arithmetic identities independent of statistical reasoning and thus cannot be violated by data that meets the conditions for their validity. Two experimentally performable procedures are described to meet these conditions. Once such data are acquired, it follows that the measured correlations cannot all equal a negative cosine of angular differences. The relation between this finding and the predictions of quantum mechanics is discussed in a companion paper.

15 pages, 2 figures

References in corpus (1)

• Bell's inequalities II: logical loophole in their interpretation

Cited by in corpus (14)

• Quantum theory as the most robust description of reproducible experiments
• Event-based computer simulation model of Aspect-type experiments strictly satisfying Einstein's locality conditions
• Event-based simulation of quantum physics experiments
• Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Bohm experiments: a discrete data driven approach
• Discrete-event simulation of an extended Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Bohm experiment
• Correlations for a new Bell's inequality experiment
• Bell's inequalities II: logical loophole in their interpretation
• The Bell inequalities: identifying what is testable and what is not
• Bell's Theory with no Locality assumption: putting Free Will at work
• Can foreign exchange rates violate Bell inequalities?
• Bell's inequality violation due to misidentification of spatially non stationary random processes
• Event-by-event simulation of quantum phenomena
• What's wrong with this rebuttal?
• Logical difficulty from combining counterfactuals in the GHZ-Bell theorems