Is Our Universe Decaying at an Astronomical Rate?
arXiv:hep-th/0612137 · doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2008.08.039
Abstract
Unless our universe is decaying at an astronomical rate (i.e., on the present cosmological timescale of Gigayears, rather than on the quantum recurrence timescale of googolplexes), it would apparently produce an infinite number of observers per comoving volume by thermal or vacuum fluctuations (Boltzmann brains). If the number of ordinary observers per comoving volume is finite, this scenario seems to imply zero likelihood for us to be ordinary observers and minuscule likelihoods for our actual observations. Hence, our observations suggest that this scenario is incorrect and that perhaps our universe is decaying at an astronomical rate.
arXiv comment4 pages, RevTeX4
References in corpus (27)
- Observational Evidence from Supernovae for an Accelerating Universe and a Cosmological Constant
- Measurements of Omega and Lambda from 42 High-Redshift Supernovae
- First Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Determination of Cosmological Parameters
- Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Three Year Results: Implications for Cosmology
- Final Results from the Hubble Space Telescope Key Project to Measure the Hubble Constant
- Predictions from Quantum Cosmology
- The Trouble with de Sitter Space
- Positive vacuum energy and the N-bound
- Probabilities in the inflationary multiverse
- Can the universe afford inflation?
- Sinks in the Landscape, Boltzmann Brains, and the Cosmological Constant Problem
- Holographic probabilities in eternal inflation
- Stationary Universe
- Is Our Universe Likely to Decay within 20 Billion Years?
- A paradox in the global description of the multiverse
- Domain walls, near-BPS bubbles, and probabilities in the landscape
- Making Predictions in Eternally Inflating Universe
- Unambiguous probabilities in an eternally inflating universe
- Hurdles for Recent Measures in Eternal Inflation
- Counting Pockets with World Lines in Eternal Inflation
- Return of the Boltzmann Brains
- Freak observers and the measure of the multiverse
- A measure of the multiverse
- On Regularization Scheme Dependence of Predictions in Inflationary Cosmology
- Eternal observers and bubble abundances in the landscape
- Sensible Quantum Mechanics: Are Probabilities only in the Mind?
- Susskind's Challenge to the Hartle-Hawking No-Boundary Proposal and Possible Resolutions
Cited by in corpus (29)
- Dark Energy
- The cosmological Higgstory of the vacuum instability
- Sinks in the Landscape, Boltzmann Brains, and the Cosmological Constant Problem
- Are We Typical?
- Conditions for (No) Eternal Inflation
- Astronomical bounds on future big freeze singularity
- Cosmological measure with volume averaging and the vacuum energy problem
- The Born Rule Dies
- Science in a Very Large Universe
- Asymptotic Observables and the Swampland
- Cosmological Measures without Volume Weighting
- Evidence for a bound on the lifetime of de Sitter space
- Eternal Inflation, past and future
- The status of cosmological natural selection
- Observational Selection Effects in Quantum Cosmology
- Arrow of Time in String Theory
- Out of equilibrium: understanding cosmological evolution to lower-entropy states
- Symmetric-Bounce Quantum State of the Universe
- Initial Conditions for Bubble Universes
- Agnesi Weighting for the Measure Problem of Cosmology
- The Arrow Of Time In The Landscape
- No-Bang Quantum State of the Cosmos
- Typicality, Freak Observers and the Anthropic Principle of Existence
- Possibilities for Probabilities
- Possible Anthropic Support for a Decaying Universe: A Cosmic Doomsday Argument
- Spacetime Average Density (SAD) Cosmological Measures
- Horizon Complementarity and Casimir Violations of the Null Energy Condition
- The Many Computations Interpretation (MCI) of Quantum Mechanics
- Disentangling the Cosmic/Comoving Duality: The Cognitive Stability and Typicality Tests