On the Number of Iterations for Dantzig-Wolfe Optimization and Packing-Covering Approximation Algorithms
arXiv:cs/0205046 · doi:10.1007/3-540-48777-8_24
Abstract
We give a lower bound on the iteration complexity of a natural class of Lagrangean-relaxation algorithms for approximately solving packing/covering linear programs. We show that, given an input with random 0/1-constraints on variables, with high probability, any such algorithm requires iterations to compute a -approximate solution, where is the width of the input. The bound is tight for a range of the parameters . The algorithms in the class include Dantzig-Wolfe decomposition, Benders' decomposition, Lagrangean relaxation as developed by Held and Karp [1971] for lower-bounding TSP, and many others (e.g. by Plotkin, Shmoys, and Tardos [1988] and Grigoriadis and Khachiyan [1996]). To prove the bound, we use a discrepancy argument to show an analogous lower bound on the support size of -approximate mixed strategies for random two-player zero-sum 0/1-matrix games.
References in corpus (3)
Cited by in corpus (9)
- Sequential and Parallel Algorithms for Mixed Packing and Covering
- A Nearly Linear-Time PTAS for Explicit Fractional Packing and Covering Linear Programs
- On the Number of Iterations for Dantzig-Wolfe Optimization and Packing-Covering Approximation Algorithms
- Tight Bounds for Approximate Carathéodory and Beyond
- Approximate Convex Optimization by Online Game Playing
- On-Line End-to-End Congestion Control
- Faster Approximation Schemes for Fractional Multicommodity Flow Problems via Dynamic Graph Algorithms
- On the Convergence of Step Decay Step-Size for Stochastic Optimization
- Adversarial Online Learning with noise