Reply to "Comment on 'Charge expulsion and electric field in superconductors'"
arXiv:cond-mat/0412091 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.70.226504
Abstract
I argue that the validity of the new electrodynamic equations for superconductors proposed in my paper can and should be decided by experiment. Furthermore I show that BCS theory is ambiguous in its prediction of screening of longitudinal electric fields and hence cannot be used to decide between the validity of my theory versus the conventional theory. I also give a physical argument for why screening of electric fields by superconducting electrons should be expected to be less efficient than that by normal electrons, as predicted by the new equations.
arXiv commentReply to Koyama's comment (cond-mat/0412090), that argues that my paper Phys. Rev B 68, 184502 (2003) is not correct. To be published in Phys.Rev. B
References in corpus (4)
Cited by in corpus (9)
- The origin of the Meissner effect in new and old superconductors
- Control of bulk superconductivity in a BCS superconductor by surface charge doping via electrochemical gating
- Proximity Eliashberg theory of electrostatic field-effect-doping in superconducting films
- Ionic gating in metallic superconductors: A brief review
- Geometric treatment of electromagnetic phenomena in conducting materials: variational principles
- Extended time-dependent Ginzburg-Landau theory
- Experimental consequences of predicted charge rigidity of superconductors
- Polarization Controlled Supercurrent in Ferroelectric Josephson Junction
- Influence of the interplay between de Gennes boundary conditions and cubicity of Ginzburg-Landau equation on the properties of superconducting films