Reply to Comment on "Continuous quantum measurement: inelastic tunneling and lack of current oscillations"
arXiv:cond-mat/0406751 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.069702
Abstract
We reply to a comment by Averin and Korotkov http://uk.arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0404549 on Stace and Barrett, PRL 92, 136802 (2004) http://link.aps.org/abstract/PRL/v92/e136802, showing that their specific criticisms are unfounded, and clarifying some of our results.
1 page, no figures
References in corpus (7)
- Few-Electron Quantum Dot Circuit with Integrated Charge Read-Out
- Continuous weak measurement of quantum coherent oscillations
- Differential Charge Sensing and Charge Delocalization in a Tunable Double Quantum Dot
- Dynamics of a mesoscopic qubit under continuous quantum measurement
- Continuous quantum measurement: inelastic tunnelling suppresses current oscillations
- Output spectrum of a measuring device at arbitrary voltage and temperature
- Comment on "Continuous quantum measurement: inelastic tunneling and lack of current oscillations"
Cited by in corpus (5)
- Spontaneous Relaxation of a Charge Qubit under Electrical Measurement
- Simple theory of the measured current through quantum dots
- Quantum measurement of an electron in disordered potential: delocalization versus measurement voltages
- Qubit measurement using a quantum point contact with a quantum Langevin equation approach
- Double detected spin-dependent quantum dot